Primary care providers' use of and attitudes towards placebos: An exploratory focus group study with US physicians

被引:15
作者
Bernstein, Michael H. [1 ]
Locher, Cosima [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Stewart-Ferrer, Sif [5 ]
Buergler, Sarah [4 ]
DesRoches, Catherine M. [6 ]
Dossett, Michelle L. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Miller, Franklin G. [10 ]
Grose, Deborah [11 ]
Blease, Charlotte R. [6 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Ctr Alcohol & Addict Studies, Dept Behav & Social Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, 121 South Main St,Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Plymouth, Sch Psychol, Plymouth, Devon, England
[4] Univ Basel, Div Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, Denmark
[6] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[8] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Benson Henry Inst Mind Body Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[9] Univ Calif Davis, Div Gen Internal Med Geriatr & Bioeth, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[10] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Div Med Eth, New York, NY USA
[11] Beth Isreal Deaconess Med Ctr, Program Placebo Studies, Boston, MA USA
[12] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Psychol, Dublin, Ireland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
placebo; placebo effect; open label placebo; primary care; GENERAL-PRACTICE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1111/bjhp.12429
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective To examine how primary care physicians define placebo concepts, use placebos in clinical practice, and view open-label placebos (OLPs). Design Semi-structured focus groups that were audio-recorded and content-coded. Methods Two focus groups with a total of 15 primary care physicians occurred at medical centres in the New England region of the United States. Prior experience using placebo treatments and attitudes towards open-label placebos were explored. Themes were analysed using an inductive data-driven approach. Results Physicians displayed a nuanced understanding of placebos and placebo effects in clinical contexts which sometimes focused on relational factors. Some respondents reported that they prescribed treatments with no known pharmacological effect for certain conditions and symptoms ('impure placebos') and that such prescriptions were more common for pain disorders, functional disorders, and medically unexplained symptoms. Opinions about OLP were mixed: Some viewed OLPs favourably or considered them 'harmless'; however, others strongly rejected OLPs as disrespectful to patients. Other issues in relation to OLPs included the following: lack of guidelines, legal and reputational concerns, and the notion that such treatments would run counter to customary medical practice. Conclusions A number of physicians reported prescribing impure placebos in clinical care. Although some primary care physicians were resistant to the possibility of recommending OLPs, others regarded OLPs more favourably, viewing them as potential treatments, albeit with restricted potential. Statement of contribution What is already known? Many physicians report prescribing drugs for the purposes of eliciting a placebo effect. Initial evidence for the efficacy of open-label placebos is promising. What does this study add? A more nuanced description of the circumstances under which primary care physicians report placebo prescribing. A qualitative account of physician attitudes about using open-label placebos in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 614
页数:19
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Benedetti F., 2014, PLACEBO EFFECTS, V2nd
[2]   Opioid-mediated placebo responses boost pain endurance and physical performance: Is it doping in sport competitions? [J].
Benedetti, Fabrizio ;
Pollo, Antonella ;
Colloca, Luana .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (44) :11934-11939
[3]   The health professional-patient-relationship in conventional versus complementary and alternative medicine. A qualitative study comparing the perceived use of medical shared decision-making between two different approaches of medicine [J].
Berger, Stephanie ;
Braehler, Elmar ;
Ernst, Jochen .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 88 (01) :129-137
[4]  
Bernstein Michael H, 2017, Curr Psychiatr, V16, P29
[5]   When and Why Placebo-Prescribing Is Acceptable and Unacceptable: A Focus Group Study of Patients' Views [J].
Bishop, Felicity L. ;
Aizlewood, Lizzi ;
Adams, Alison E. M. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (07)
[6]   Overcoming disagreement: a roadmap for placebo studies [J].
Blease, Charlotte ;
Annoni, Marco .
BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 2019, 34 (02)
[7]   CONSENSUS IN PLACEBO STUDIES lessons from the philosophy of science [J].
Blease, Charlotte .
PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 61 (03) :412-429
[8]   Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome [J].
Blease, Charlotte ;
Carel, Havi ;
Geraghty, Keith .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 43 (08) :549-557
[9]   Are open-Label Placebos Ethical? Informed Consent and Ethical Equivocations [J].
Blease, Charlotte ;
Colloca, Luana ;
Kaptchuk, Ted J. .
BIOETHICS, 2016, 30 (06) :407-414
[10]   The role of placebos in family medicine Implications of evidence and ethics for general practitioners [J].
Blease, Charlotte R. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 48 (10) :700-705