Refinement of the Hardening Soil model within the small strain range

被引:53
作者
Cudny, Marcin [1 ]
Truty, Andrzej [2 ]
机构
[1] Gdansk Univ Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Ul Narutowicza 11-12, PL-80233 Gdansk, Poland
[2] Cracow Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn, Ul Warszawska 24, PL-31155 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Hardening Soil model; Small strain stiffness; Soil constitutive modelling; STIFFNESS; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s11440-020-00945-5
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The popularity of the elasto-plastic Hardening Soil (HS) model is based on simple parameter identification from standard testing and empirical formulas. The HS model is implemented in many commercial FE codes designed to analyse geotechnical problems. In its basic version, the stress-strain behaviour within the elastic range is subject to the hypoelastic power law, which assures the barotropy of the elastic stiffness. However, a proper modelling within the small strain range, i.e. strain-induced stiffness degradation and correct reproduction of the hysteretic behaviour, was one of the most important drawbacks in the HS formulation. The first small strain stiffness extension to the HS model was proposed by Benz (Small strain stiffness of soils and its numerical consequences, 2007), and the new model was called Hardening Soil Small (HSS). Despite the simple isotropic formulation, its applicability was proved in various numerical simulations in geotechnics. However, the HSS formulation exhibits a serious fault known in the literature as overshooting, i.e. uncontrolled reset of the loading memory after tiny unloading-reloading cycles. The authors' main aim was to retain the set of material parameters for the HSS formulation and to propose a new small strain extension to the HS model without overshooting. The new proposal is based on theBrickmodel which represents the concept of nested yield surfaces in strain space. The implementation aspects of the new HS-Brick model are described, and its performance is presented in some element tests and selected boundary value problems by comparisons with the HSS formulation.
引用
收藏
页码:2031 / 2051
页数:21
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]  
Lansivaara T, 1998, APPL NUMERICAL METHO, P347
[22]  
Larsson R., 1996, Mechanics of Cohesivefrictional Materials, V1, P367, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199610)1:43.0.CO
[23]  
2-F
[24]   Protecting sensitive constructions from tunnelling: the case of World Heritage buildings in Barcelona [J].
Ledesma, A. ;
Alonso, E. E. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2017, 67 (10) :914-925
[25]   Modelling glacial till under triaxial conditions using a BRICK soil model [J].
Lehane, BM ;
Simpson, B .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 37 (05) :1078-1088
[26]   Anisotropic stiffness parameters and their measurement in a stiff natural clay [J].
Lings, ML ;
Pennington, DS ;
Nash, DFT .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2000, 50 (02) :109-125
[27]   Small strain stiffness anisotropy of natural sedimentary clays: review and a model [J].
Masin, David ;
Rott, Josef .
ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2014, 9 (02) :299-312
[28]  
Masing G., 1926, P 2 INT C APPL MECH, P332
[29]   ON DESCRIPTION OF ANISOTROPIC WORKHARDENING [J].
MROZ, Z .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1967, 15 (03) :163-&
[30]   Discussion on "Dynamic soil-structure interaction: A three-dimensional numerical approach and its application to the Lotung case study". Poor performance of the HSS model [J].
Niemunis, A. ;
Cudny, M. .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2018, 98 :243-245