Contrasting Instrumental Views on Corporate Social Responsibility: Short-term versus Long-term Profit Orientation Approach

被引:4
作者
Turker, Duygu [1 ]
机构
[1] Yasar Univ, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
来源
11TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE | 2015年 / 207卷
关键词
Corporate social responsibility (CSR); CSR involvement; short-term profit orientation; long-term profit orientation; PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENT; FIRM; MANAGERIAL; COMMITMENT; STRATEGY; PRODUCT; SOCIETY; GREEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.128
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The theoretical debate over the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been proliferated with the rise of diverse approaches during the last decades. The current study focuses particularly on the instrumental theories on CSR, which are grouped by Garriga and Mele's under three diverse approaches, and discuss how and why we need a new configuration over this group of theories as short-term profit oriented approach and long-term profit oriented approach to adapt to the task environment. In order to investigate whether the proposed theoretical distinctions between short-term and long-term orientation affects the CSR involvement, a survey was conducted over a sample of Turkish managers of business organizations. The results of study demonstrate that while short-term thinking of CSR negatively affects the CSR involvement to employees, government, community, and ethical issues; affects positively to CSR involvement to environment. In contrast to this result, the long-term thinking of CSR positively affects the CSR involvement to employees, environment, government, community, and ethical issues. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 576
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[51]   Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility [J].
Sen, S ;
Bhattacharya, CB .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (02) :225-243
[52]  
Smith S., 2014, ADV HOSPITALITY LEIS, V9, P49
[53]   Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world's most successful firms [J].
Snider, J ;
Hill, RP ;
Martin, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 48 (02) :175-187
[54]   Exploring corporate citizenship and purchase intention: mediating effects of brand trust and corporate identification [J].
Tsai, Yuan Hui ;
Joe, Sheng-Wuu ;
Lin, Chieh-Peng ;
Chiu, Chou-Kang ;
Shen, Kuei-Tzu .
BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2015, 24 (04) :361-377
[55]   Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees [J].
Turban, DB ;
Greening, DW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (03) :658-672
[56]   How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment [J].
Turker, Duygu .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 89 (02) :189-204
[57]   Social responsibility in new ventures: profiting from a long-term orientation [J].
Wang, Taiyuan ;
Bansal, Pratima .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (10) :1135-1153
[58]   Compassion organizing: Employees' satisfaction with corporate philanthropic disaster response and reduced job strain [J].
Watkins, Marla Baskerville ;
Ren, Run ;
Umphress, Elizabeth E. ;
Boswell, Wendy R. ;
Triana, Maria del Carmen ;
Zardkoohi, Asghar .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 88 (02) :436-458
[59]   Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches [J].
Windsor, D .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (01) :93-114
[60]  
Zorn T.E., 2007, The debate over corporate social responsibility, P405