Outcomes of adjuvant endocrine therapy and hormone receptor status change following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

被引:2
作者
Wu, Jia Yi [1 ]
Chen, Wei Guo [1 ]
Chen, Xiao Song [1 ]
Huang, Ou [1 ]
He, Jian Rong [1 ]
Zhu, Li [1 ]
Li, Yafen [1 ]
Shen, Kun Wei [1 ]
Chow, Louis W. C. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Loo, Wings T. Y. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chow, Christopher Y. C. [3 ,4 ]
Tsang, William [5 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Comprehens Breast Hlth Ctr, Ruijin Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[2] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Macau Inst Appl Res Med & Hlth, State Key Lab Qual Res Chinese Med, Macau, Peoples R China
[3] Org Oncol & Translat Res, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] UNIMED Med Inst, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; Endocrine therapy; Hormone receptor; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; PROGESTERONE RECEPTORS; SYSTEMIC THERAPY; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; METAANALYSIS; HIGHLIGHTS; RECURRENCE; TAMOXIFEN; TUMORS;
D O I
10.5301/jbm.5000113
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: This retrospective study investigated the therapeutic benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in breast cancer patients with hormone receptor (HR) status change from positive to negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: From December 2000 to November 2010, 97 eligible patients with a positive-to-negative switch of HR status after NAC were identified. All patients were categorized into 2 groups on the basis of the administration of ET: 57 ET-administered patients and 40 ET-naive patients. Survival analyses were performed to examine the prognostic value of ET administration as well as other clinical and pathologic variables. Results: The administration of ET was significantly associated with improved disease-free survival (p=0.018) in patients with a positive-to-negative switch of HR status. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 77.0% and 55.5%, respectively, in ET-administered patients and ET-naive patients. The 5-year overall survival rate for ET-administered patients was also higher than that of ET-naive patients (81.3% vs. 72.7%, p=0.053), albeit this was statistically insignificant. Conclusions: This study revealed that patients with HR altered from positive to negative after NAC still benefit from ET. The HR status should be evaluated not only in specimens obtained during post-NAC surgery but also in specimens biopsied before NAC.
引用
收藏
页码:E380 / E386
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Prognostic effect of estrogen receptor status across age in primary breast cancer [J].
Bentzon, Niels ;
Duering, Maria ;
Rasmussen, Birgitte Bruun ;
Mouridsen, Henning ;
Kroman, Niels .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 122 (05) :1089-1094
[2]  
Berruti Alfredo, 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, P147, DOI 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgr037
[3]   Evaluation of ER, PgR, HER-2 and Ki-67 as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for operable breast cancer [J].
Burcombe, RJ ;
Makris, A ;
Richman, PI ;
Daley, FM ;
Noble, S ;
Pittam, M ;
Wright, D ;
Allen, SA ;
Dove, J ;
Wilson, GD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (01) :147-155
[4]   Molecular subtype can predict the response and outcome of Chinese locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with preoperative therapy [J].
Chen, Mao Song ;
Wu, Jia Yi ;
Huang, Ou ;
Chen, Can Ming ;
Wu, Jiong ;
Lu, Jin Song ;
Shao, Zhi Ming ;
Shen, Zhen Zhou ;
Shen, Kun Wei .
ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2010, 23 (05) :1213-1220
[5]   Prognostic Value of a Positive-to-negative Change in Hormone Receptor Status after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer [J].
Chen, Sheng ;
Chen, Can-Ming ;
Yu, Ke-Da ;
Zhou, Ruo-Ji ;
Shao, Zhi-Ming .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (09) :3002-3011
[6]   Accuracy of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status between core needle and open excision biopsy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Xiaosong ;
Yuan, Ying ;
Gu, Zhaoxiang ;
Shen, Kunwei .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 134 (03) :957-967
[7]   Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials [J].
Davies, C. ;
Godwin, J. ;
Gray, R. ;
Clarke, M. ;
Darby, S. ;
McGale, P. ;
Wang, Y. C. ;
Peto, R. ;
Pan, H. C. ;
Cutter, D. ;
Taylor, C. ;
Ingle, J. .
LANCET, 2011, 378 (9793) :771-784
[8]   Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial [J].
Davies, Christina ;
Pan, Hongchao ;
Godwin, Jon ;
Gray, Richard ;
Arriagada, Rodrigo ;
Raina, Vinod ;
Abraham, Mirta ;
Medeiros Alencar, Victor Hugo ;
Badran, Atef ;
Bonfill, Xavier ;
Bradbury, Joan ;
Clarke, Michael ;
Collins, Rory ;
Davis, Susan R. ;
Delmestri, Antonella ;
Forbes, John F. ;
Haddad, Peiman ;
Hou, Ming-Feng ;
Inbar, Moshe ;
Khaled, Hussein ;
Kielanowska, Joanna ;
Kwan, Wing-Hong ;
Mathew, Beela S. ;
Mittra, Indraneel ;
Mueller, Bettina ;
Nicolucci, Antonio ;
Peralta, Octavio ;
Pernas, Fany ;
Petruzelka, Lubos ;
Pienkowski, Tadeusz ;
Radhika, Ramachandran ;
Rajan, Balakrishnan ;
Rubach, Maryna T. ;
Tort, Sera ;
Urrutia, Gerard ;
Valentini, Miriam ;
Wang, Yaochen ;
Peto, Richard .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9869) :805-816
[9]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[10]   Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 [J].
Goldhirsch, A. ;
Wood, W. C. ;
Coates, A. S. ;
Gelber, R. D. ;
Thuerlimann, B. ;
Senn, H. -J. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (08) :1736-1747