Restricted feed intake in lactating primiparous sows. I. Effects on sow metabolic state and subsequent reproductive performance

被引:33
作者
Patterson, J. L. [1 ]
Smit, M. N. [1 ]
Novak, S. [1 ]
Wellen, A. P. [1 ]
Foxcroft, G. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Agr Food & Nutr Sci, Swine Reprod Dev Program, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
catabolism; epigenetics; MAMMARY-GLAND GROWTH; LITTER SIZE; FOLLICULAR DEVELOPMENT; DIFFERENT PATTERNS; OOCYTE MATURATION; PROTEIN LOSS; IMPACT; EFFICIENCY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1071/RD11015
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The effects of feed restriction (60% of anticipated feed intake; Restrict; n-60) during the last week of a 21-day lactation in primiparous sows compared with feeding at 90% of anticipated feed intake (Control; n=60) on sow metabolic state, litter growth and sow reproductive performance after weaning were compared. Metabolisable energy (ME) derived from feed was lower, ME derived from body tissues was higher and litter growth rate was reduced (all P<0.05) in Restrict sows during the last week of lactation. Treatment did not affect weaning-to-oestrus interval, pregnancy rate, ovulation rate, embryonic survival or the number of live embryos (P>0.05) at Day 30 of gestation: However, embryo weight was greater (P<0.05) in Control than in Restrict sows (1.55 +/- 0.04 vs 1.44 +/- 0.04 g, respectively). These data suggest the biology of the commercial sow has changed and reproductive performance of contemporary primiparous sows is increasingly resistant to the negative effects of lactational catabolism. Overall, catabolism negatively affected litter weaning weight and embryonic development of the next litter, but the extent to which individual sows used tissue mobilisation to support these litter outcomes was highly variable.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 898
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Almeida FRCL, 2000, J ANIM SCI, V78, P1556
[2]   Nutritional effects on oocyte and embryo development in mammals: implications for reproductive efficiency and environmental sustainability [J].
Ashworth, Cheryl J. ;
Toma, Luiza M. ;
Hunter, Morag G. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 364 (1534) :3351-3361
[3]   Lactation efficiency as a result of body composition dynamics and feed intake in sows [J].
Bergsma, R. ;
Kanis, E. ;
Verstegen, M. W. A. ;
van der Peet-Schwering, C. M. C. ;
Knol, E. F. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2009, 125 (2-3) :208-222
[4]   Epigenetic regulation of transcription: a mechanism for inducing variations in phenotype (fetal programming) by differences in nutrition during early life? [J].
Burdge, Graham C. ;
Hanson, Mark A. ;
Slater-Jefferies, Jo L. ;
Lillycrop, Karen A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2007, 97 (06) :1036-1046
[5]  
Clowes EJ, 2003, J ANIM SCI, V81, P753
[6]  
Clowes EJ, 2003, J ANIM SCI, V81, P1517
[7]   BALANCE TRIALS AND COMPARATIVE SLAUGHTERING IN BREEDING SOWS - DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUES AND OBSERVED ACCURACY [J].
EVERTS, H ;
DEKKER, RA .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1994, 37 (03) :339-352
[8]   Macroenvironment effects on oocytes and embryos in swine [J].
Foxcroft, G. R. ;
Vinsky, M. D. ;
Paradis, F. ;
Tse, W.-Y. ;
Town, S. C. ;
Putman, C. T. ;
Dyck, M. K. ;
Dixon, W. T. .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2007, 68 :S30-S39
[9]  
Foxcroft G R, 2006, J Anim Sci, V84 Suppl, pE105
[10]  
Foxcroft G R, 2009, Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl, V66, P213