Implementation of the 21-gene recurrence score test in the United States in 2011

被引:9
作者
Lynch, Julie A. [1 ,2 ]
Berse, Brygida [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Petkov, Valentina [5 ]
Filipski, Kelly [5 ]
Zhou, Yingjun [5 ]
Khoury, Muin J. [6 ,7 ]
Hassett, Michael [8 ,9 ]
Freedman, Andrew N. [5 ]
机构
[1] VA Salt Lake City Hlth Care Syst, Salt Lake City, UT 84148 USA
[2] RTI Int, Durham, NC 27709 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[4] Vet Hlth Adm, Bedford, MA USA
[5] NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Off Publ Hlth Genom, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] NCI, Epidemiol & Genom Res Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[8] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[9] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
关键词
breast cancer; cancer genomics; dissemination; equity; implementation; BREAST-CANCER SUBTYPES; GENE-EXPRESSION; BIOLOGICAL SUBTYPES; ASSAY; POPULATION; ESTROGEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; RISK;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2015.218
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: We examined hospital use of the 21-gene breast cancer test in the United States. We report state-level differences in utilization and propose a model for predicting implementation of -guideline-recommended genomic testing. Methods: Genomic Health provided test orders for calendar year 2011. We summarized utilization at the hospital and state levels. Using logistic regression, we analyzed the association between the likelihood to order the test and the hospital's institutional and regional characteristics. Results: In 2011, 45% of 4,712 acute-care hospitals ordered the test, which suggests that 25% of newly diagnosed invasive female breast cancer cases were tested. Significant predictors of testing included participation in National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical research cooperative groups (odds ratio (OR) 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 2.96-4.70), advanced imaging (OR, 2.19; CI, 1.78-2.68), high-complexity laboratory (OR, 2.15; CI, 1.24-3.70), affiliation with a medical school (OR, 1.57; CI, 1.31-1.88), and reconstructive surgery (OR, 1.23; CI, 1.01-1.50). Significant regional predictors included metropolitan county (OR, 3.77; CI, 2.83-5.03), above-mean income (OR, 1.37; CI, 1.11-1.69), and education (OR, 1.26; CI, 1.03-1.54). Negative predictors included designation as a critical-access hospital (OR, 0.10; CI, 0.07-0.14) and distance from an NCI cancer center (OR, 0.998; CI, 0.997-0.999), with a 15% decrease in likelihood for every 100 miles. Conclusion: Despite considerable market penetration of the test, there are significant regional and site-of-care differences in implementation, particularly in rural states.
引用
收藏
页码:982 / 990
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   The effects of oncotype DX recurrence scores on chemotherapy utilization in a multi-institutional breast cancer cohort [J].
Ademuyiwa, Foluso O. ;
Miller, Austin ;
O'Connor, Tracey ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Thorat, Mangesh A. ;
Sledge, George W. ;
Levine, Ellis ;
Badve, Sunil .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 126 (03) :797-802
[2]   Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100 000 women in 123 randomised trials [J].
Albain, K. ;
Anderson, S. ;
Arriagada, R. ;
Barlow, W. ;
Bergh, J. ;
Bliss, J. ;
Buyse, M. ;
Cameron, D. ;
Carrasco, E. ;
Clarke, M. ;
Correa, C. ;
Coates, A. ;
Collins, R. ;
Costantino, J. ;
Cutter, D. ;
Cuzick, J. ;
Darby, S. ;
Davidson, N. ;
Davies, C. ;
Davies, K. ;
Delmestri, A. ;
Di Leo, A. ;
Dowsett, M. ;
Elphinstone, P. ;
Evans, V. ;
Ewertz, M. ;
Gelber, R. ;
Gettins, L. ;
Geyer, C. ;
Goldhirsch, A. ;
Godwin, J. ;
Gray, R. ;
Gregory, C. ;
Hayes, D. ;
Hill, C. ;
Ingle, J. ;
Jakesz, R. ;
James, S. ;
Kaufmann, M. ;
Kerr, A. ;
MacKinnon, E. ;
McGale, P. ;
McHugh, T. ;
Norton, L. ;
Ohashi, Y. ;
Paik, S. ;
Pan, H. C. ;
Perez, E. ;
Peto, R. ;
Piccart, M. .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9814) :432-444
[3]  
American Medical Association, COD CPT PROP REIMB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, United States Cancer Statistics: 1999-2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report
[5]   Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype - A population-based study from the California Cancer Registry [J].
Bauer, Katrina R. ;
Brown, Monica ;
Cress, Rosemary D. ;
Parise, Carol A. ;
Caggiano, Vincent .
CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) :1721-1728
[6]   Can some patients avoid adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer? [J].
Bedard, Philippe L. ;
Cardoso, Fatima .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 8 (05) :272-279
[7]   Impact of Oncotype DX on Treatment Decisions in ER-Positive, Node-Negative Breast Cancer with Histologic Correlation [J].
Biroschak, Julianne R. ;
Schwartz, Gordon F. ;
Palazzo, Juan P. ;
Toll, Adam D. ;
Brill, Kristin L. ;
Jaslow, Rebecca J. ;
Lee, Sun Yong .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (03) :269-275
[8]   The interface of Medicare coverage decision-making and emerging molecular-based laboratory testing [J].
Burken, Mitchell I. ;
Wilson, Kathleen S. ;
Heller, Karen ;
Pratt, Victoria M. ;
Schoonmaker, Michele M. ;
Seifter, Eric .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (04) :225-231
[9]  
Cadoo KA, 2013, Q J NUCL MED MOL IM, V57, P312
[10]   Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Livasy, Chad A. ;
Dressler, Lynn G. ;
Cowan, David ;
Conway, Kathleen ;
Karaca, Gamze ;
Troester, Melissa A. ;
Tse, Chiu Kit ;
Edmiston, Sharon ;
Deming, Sandra L. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Moorman, Patricia G. ;
Earp, H. Shelton ;
Millikan, Robert C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21) :2492-2502