Analysis of the Prognostic Significance of Circulating Tumor DNA in Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer

被引:3
作者
Shaya, Justin [1 ]
Nonato, Taylor [1 ]
Cabal, Angelo [1 ]
Randall, James Michael [1 ]
Millard, Frederick [1 ]
Stewart, Tyler [1 ]
McKay, Rana R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, 3855 Hlth Sci Dr 0987, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
ctDNA; Liquid biopsy; Precision oncology; Prostate cancer; Prognostic markers;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2021.07.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In advanced prostate cancer, circulating tumor (ctDNA) has been increasingly used for genomic sequencing. We examined the real-world use of commercial ctDNA assays among a cohort of patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and assessed the ctDNA genomic landscape, rate of actionable alterations, and the correlation of ctDNA characteristics with survival. We found that ctDNA detected pathogenic alterations in most patients and the number of detected alterations was strongly associated with inferior overall survival. Background: There has been considerable interest in ctDNA next generation sequencing platforms to assess genomic alterations in mCRPC given its accessibility and identification of temporal genomic data. Patientsand Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed 63 patients who underwent ctDNA genomic profiling during their mCRPC disease course using a CLIA-certified commercial assay. The primary objective was to assess the feasibility of commercial ctDNA analysis in a real world mCRPC cohort. Key secondary objectives included assessment of the landscape of pathogenic ctDNA alterations and the prognostic significance of ctDNA detection on overall survival (OS). Results: Among the cohort, at the time of ctDNA collection, median age was 70 years, and 47.6% (N = 30/63) had bone-only metastases. ctDNA was detected in the majority of patients with at least 1 pathogenic alteration detected in 90.5% (N = 57/63) of individuals. The most common alterations detected were in AR, TP53, and PIK3CA. Actionable alterations with FDA-approved therapies were found in 15.8% (N = 10) of the cohort. The presence of <= 1 versus > 1 alteration on ctDNA analysis was strongly associated with inferior OS with a median OS of 26.1 versus 8.8 months, respectively (HR = 7.0, 95% CI, 2.2-23.1, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, the number of detected alterations remained a significant predictor for OS. Lastly, there was weak correlation between Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), and ctDNA characteristics. Conclusion: ctDNA is a viable next generation sequencing (NGS) platform in mCRPC and can be utilized to identify actionable alterations. The presence and extent of ctDNA alterations appear to be prognostic of OS in mCRPC. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:564.e1 / 564.e10
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Rucaparib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Alteration
    Abida, Wassim
    Patnaik, Akash
    Campbell, David
    Shapiro, Jeremy
    Bryce, Alan H.
    McDermott, Ray
    Sautois, Brieuc
    Vogelzang, Nicholas J.
    Bambury, Richard M.
    Voog, Eric
    Zhang, Jingsong
    Piulats, Josep M.
    Ryan, Charles J.
    Merseburger, Axel S.
    Daugaard, Gedske
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Fizazi, Karim
    Higano, Celestia S.
    Krieger, Laurence E.
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    Watkins, Simon P.
    Despain, Darrin
    Simmons, Andrew D.
    Loehr, Andrea
    Dowson, Melanie
    Golsorkhi, Tony
    Chowdhury, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (32) : 3763 - +
  • [2] Circulating Tumor DNA Genomics Correlate with Resistance to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer
    Annala, Matti
    Vandekerkhove, Gillian
    Khalaf, Daniel
    Taavitsainen, Sinja
    Beja, Kevin
    Warner, Evan W.
    Sunderland, Katherine
    Kollmannsberger, Christian
    Eigl, Bernhard J.
    Finch, Daygen
    Oja, Conrad D.
    Vergidis, Joanna
    Zulfiqar, Muhammad
    Azad, Arun A.
    Nykter, Matti
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Wyatt, Alexander W.
    Chi, Kim N.
    [J]. CANCER DISCOVERY, 2018, 8 (04) : 444 - 457
  • [3] [Anonymous], PROST CANC BIOM ENR
  • [4] Caffo O, 2016, ANN ONCOL, V27, piv31
  • [5] Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    de Bono, J.
    Mateo, J.
    Fizazi, K.
    Saad, F.
    Shore, N.
    Sandhu, S.
    Chi, K. N.
    Sartor, O.
    Agarwal, N.
    Olmos, D.
    Thiery-Vuillemin, A.
    Twardowski, P.
    Mehra, N.
    Goessl, C.
    Kang, J.
    Burgents, J.
    Wu, W.
    Kohlmann, A.
    Adelman, C. A.
    Hussain, M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (22) : 2091 - 2102
  • [6] Hahn AW., 2019, CANC TREAT RES COMMU, V19
  • [7] Updated Prognostic Model for Predicting Overall Survival in First-Line Chemotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Halabi, Susan
    Lin, Chen-Yen
    Kelly, W. Kevin
    Fizazi, Karim S.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Kaplan, Ellen B.
    Morris, Michael J.
    Small, Eric J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (07) : 671 - +
  • [8] Burden of Disease Matters When It Comes to Systemic Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Harrison, Michael R.
    Armstrong, Andrew J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (03) : 448 - 450
  • [9] Howlader N., 2016, SEER CANC STAT REV 1
  • [10] Clonal hematopoiesis
    Jan, Max
    Ebert, Benjamin L.
    Jaiswal, Siddhartha
    [J]. SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 54 (01) : 43 - 50