Analysis of pregnancy outcomes following surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

被引:6
作者
Xu, Zongxu [1 ]
Sheng, Chengcheng [1 ]
Yang, Qing [1 ]
Wang, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Shengjing Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 36 Sanhao St, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
Cesarean scar pregnancy; Subsequent pregnancy; Follow-up; INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; 1ST-LINE APPROACH; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-022-04965-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the surgical treatment approaches for patients with Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and the effects on subsequent pregnancy. Methods CSP patients admitted to Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed to collect their clinical characteristics, and follow-up of postoperative pregnancies. Results A total of 1126 CSP patients were enrolled in this study, including 595 (52.84%) CSP type I, 415 (36.86%) CSP type II, and 116 (10.30%) CSP type III cases. There were significant differences between the three types of patients in terms of beta-HCG levels, gestational sac diameter, clinical symptoms and presence of fetal heartbeat at diagnosis (P < 0.01). Among these, 89.90% of CSP type I, 88.90% of CSP type II and 50% of CSP type III patients were treated with hysteroscopic lesion excision, 7.9% of CSP type I and 2.2% of CSP type II patients underwent ultrasound-monitored curettage, and the remaining patients underwent lesion excision and and simultaneous repair of excised lesions by different routes (trans-laparoscopic, transabdominal or transvaginal methods). And 5.55% of CSP type I, 22.65% of CSP type II and 43.10% of CSP type III patients were treated with adjunctive uterine artery embolization (UAE). The patients were followed up for more than 2 years after surgery. Among the 166 re-pregnancies, 58 (34.94%) were normal pregnancies, 17 patients reoccurred with CSP, the recurrent rate of CSP was 10.24%. All 58 normal pregnancies were terminated by cesarean section, with a mean gestational week of delivery of (38.36 +/- 2.25) weeks, a mean birth weight of (3228.45 +/- 301.96)g, and the postnatal Apgar score was (9.86 +/- 0.23) points at 1 min and all 5 min were 10 points. Logistic regression analysis suggested that the number of previous cesarean deliveries was a risk factor for recurrent CSP (RCSP) (OR = 10.82, 95% CI: 2.52-46.50, P = 0.001). Conclusions The type of CSP is related to beta-HCG values, presence of fetal heartbeat, gestational sac diameter and clinical symptoms. Hysteroscopic therapy is a commonly used surgical procedure and UAE is often used as an adjuvant treatment. For subsequent pregnancies, the number of previous cesarean deliveries is a risk factor for recurrent CSP.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Caesarean scar pregnancy
    Ash, A.
    Smith, A.
    Maxwell, D.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [2] Reproductive outcomes of women with a previous history of Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies
    Ben Nagi, J.
    Helmy, S.
    Ofili-Yebovi, D.
    Yazbek, J.
    Sawyer, E.
    Jurkovic, D.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (07) : 2012 - 2015
  • [3] Menstruation recovery in scar pregnancy patients undergoing UAE and curettage and its influencing factors
    Cao, Guang-Shao
    Liu, Rui-Qing
    Liu, Yu-Yan
    Liu, Jian-Wen
    Li, Lu-Peng
    Zhang, Qiang
    Cao, Hui-Cun
    Li, Tian-Xiao
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (11)
  • [4] Cesarean Scar Pregnancy, Incidence, and Recurrence Five-Year Experience at a Single Tertiary Care Referral Center
    Grechukhina, Olga
    Deshmukh, Uma
    Fan, Linda
    Kohari, Katherine
    Abdel-Razeq, Sonya
    Bahtiyar, Mert Ozan
    Sfakianaki, Anna K.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (05) : 1285 - 1295
  • [5] Limitations of conservative treatment for repeat Cesarean scar pregnancy
    Hasegawa, J
    Ichizuka, K
    Matsuoka, R
    Otsuki, K
    Sekizawa, A
    Okai, T
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) : 310 - 311
  • [6] Intrauterine ectopic pregnancy - ultrasound typing and treatment
    Jiang, Fangyan
    Nong, Wenzheng
    Su, Haiqing
    Yu, Shuangcheng
    [J]. GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2020, 91 (03) : 111 - 116
  • [7] Jin, 2016, CHINESE J OBSTET GYN, V51, P568
  • [8] Systematic review: What is the best first-line approach for cesarean section ectopic pregnancy?
    Kanat-Pektas, Mine
    Bodur, Serkan
    Dundar, Ozgur
    Bakir, Vuslat Lale
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 55 (02): : 263 - 269
  • [9] Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options
    Litwicka, Katarzyna
    Greco, Ermanno
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 25 (06) : 456 - 461
  • [10] Comparison of three treatment strategies for cesarean scar pregnancy
    Liu, Guangquan
    Wu, Jiacong
    Cao, Jian
    Xue, Yunping
    Dai, Chencheng
    Xu, Juan
    Jia, Xuemei
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 296 (02) : 383 - 389