Why markets make mistakes

被引:7
作者
Weil, Henry Birdseye [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT Sloan Sch Management, Strategy Fac Grp, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
Behavioural economics; Commodity markets; Communication technologies; Rationalization; DYNAMICS; MODEL; SUBSTITUTION; RATIONALITY;
D O I
10.1108/03684921011081114
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose - Many models of markets are based on assumptions of rationality, transparency, efficiency, and homogeneity in various combinations. This paper aims to explain why markets routinely and repeatedly make "mistakes" that are inconsistent with these simplifying assumptions. Design/methodology/approach - System dynamics models are used to show how misestimating demand growth, allowing financial discipline to lapse, unrealistic business planning, and misperception of technology trajectories can produce disastrously wrong business decisions. Examples are drawn from airlines, telecommunications, IT, aerospace, energy, and media. Findings - The undesirable outcomes can include vicious cycles of investment and profitability, market bubbles, accelerated commoditization, excessive investment in dead-end technologies, giving up on a product that becomes a huge success, waiting too long to reinvent legacy companies, and changes in market leadership. Differentiating transient phenomena from the longer term trends, movement away from vertically integrated business models, and effective use of early warning signs avoid these mistakes; or at least limit the damage that they cause. Practical implications - Decision makers tend to rely on simple mental models which have serious limitations. They become increasingly deficient as problems grow more complex, as the environment changes more rapidly, and as the number of decision makers increases. The amplification and tipping dynamics typical of highly coupled systems, for example, bandwagon, network, and lemming effects, are not anticipated! Behavioural factors that play critical roles in the evolution of markets often are misunderstood or ignored. Originality/value - The paper illuminates the effects of bounded rationality, imperfect information, and fragmentation of decision making on the behavior of markets. Models which assume, at least implicitly, that decision makers understand the structure of the market and how it produces the dynamics' which can he observed or might potentially occur can be dangerous simplifications and seriously misleading.
引用
收藏
页码:1429 / 1451
页数:23
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FINANCIAL TIMES 0805
[2]  
AUH JH, 2003, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE
[3]   NEW PRODUCT GROWTH FOR MODEL CONSUMER DURABLES [J].
BASS, FM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1969, 15 (05) :215-227
[4]  
Christensen C. M., 1997, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
[5]   Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries [J].
Christensen, CM ;
Suárez, FF ;
Utterback, JM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (12) :S207-S220
[6]  
Christensen CM, 2000, HARVARD BUS REV, V78, P66
[7]  
DATTEE B, 2006, THESIS U COLL DUBLIN
[8]  
Dattee B, 2007, P 25 INT C SYST DYN
[9]   Dynamics of social factors in technological substitutions [J].
Dattee, Brice ;
Weil, Henry Birdseye .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2007, 74 (05) :579-607
[10]   SIMPLE SUBSTITUTION MODEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE [J].
FISHER, JC ;
PRY, RH .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1971, 3 (01) :75-88