A role for angiotensin II AT1 receptors in ureteric bud cell branching

被引:41
|
作者
Iosipiv, IV [1 ]
Schroeder, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Hlth Sci Ctr,Sect Pediat Nephrol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
development; renin;
D O I
10.1152/ajprenal.00401.2002
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Gene-targeting studies in mice demonstrate that the renin-angiotensin system is required for the proper development of the renal medulla. In the absence of angiotensin II (ANG II) or the ANG II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor, mice exhibit poor papillary development and a severe urinary-concentrating defect. These findings imply that the ureteric bud (UB) and its branches are targets for ANG II actions during renal development. However, direct evidence linking ANG II with UB-branching morphogenesis does not exist. Using immunohistochemistry, we demonstrated that UB-derived epithelia express angiotensinogen (Ao) and the AT(1) receptor during murine metanephrogenesis. Ao and AT(1) receptors are expressed in the UB branches and to a lesser extent in the stromal mesenchyme. AT(1) receptor expression in UB-derived epithelia increased from embryo day 12 to day 16 and was observed on both luminal and basolateral membranes. In accord with these findings, cultured murine UB cells express AT(1) receptor protein and mRNA. Treatment of UB cells cultured in three-dimensional type I collagen gels with ANG II (10(-7) to 10(-5) M) elicits a dose-related increase in the number of cells that have primary and secondary branches. These effects of ANG II on UB branching are abrogated by pretreatment with the AT(1) receptor antagonist candesartan. These data demonstrate a direct and independent role for ANG II acting via AT(1) receptors on UB cell branching in vitro. The presence of Ao in the stroma and AT(1) on UB cells supports the notion that cross talk between stroma and epithelial cells is crucial to epithelial branching morphogenesis in the developing kidney.
引用
收藏
页码:F199 / F207
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ureteric bud derivatives express angiotensinogen and AT1 receptors
    Prieto, M
    Dipp, S
    Meleg-Smith, S
    El-Dahr, SS
    PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS, 2001, 6 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [2] Angiotensin II stimulates in vitro branching morphogenesis of the isolated ureteric bud
    Song, Renfang
    Preston, Graeme
    Yosypiv, Ihor V.
    MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 128 (7-10) : 359 - 367
  • [3] The role of angiotensin II AT1 receptors in the sympathoadrenal response to stress
    Armando, I
    Carranza, A
    Nishimura, Y
    Hoe, KL
    Barontini, M
    Saavedra, JM
    CATECHOLAMINE RESEARCH: FROM MOLECULAR INSIGHTS TO CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2002, 53 : 313 - 316
  • [4] Role of AT1 angiotensin II receptors in renal ischemic injury
    Kontogiannis, J
    Burns, KD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 274 (01) : F79 - F90
  • [5] ROLE OF ANGIOTENSIN-II AND AT1 RECEPTORS IN HIPPOCAMPAL LTP
    WAYNER, MJ
    ARMSTRONG, DL
    POLANCURTAIN, JL
    DENNY, JB
    PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1993, 45 (02) : 455 - 464
  • [6] Role of AT1 and AT2 receptors in the plasma clearance of angiotensin II
    Iyer, SN
    Chappell, MC
    Brosnihan, KB
    Ferrario, CM
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 31 (03) : 464 - 469
  • [7] Downregulation of Spry-1, an inhibitor of GDNF/Ret, causes angiotensin II-induced ureteric bud branching
    Yosypiv, Ihor V.
    Boh, Mary K.
    Spera, Melissa A.
    El-Dahr, Samir S.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 74 (10) : 1287 - 1293
  • [8] The role of GDNF/Ret signaling in ureteric bud cell fate and branching morphogenesis
    Shakya, R
    Watanabe, T
    Costantini, F
    DEVELOPMENTAL CELL, 2005, 8 (01) : 65 - 74
  • [9] Renin–angiotensin system in ureteric bud branching morphogenesis: insights into the mechanisms
    Ihor V. Yosypiv
    Pediatric Nephrology, 2011, 26 : 1499 - 1512
  • [10] Role for endothelin and AT1 receptors in vascular responsiveness to angiotensin II in heart failure
    Crespo, M. J.
    Altieri, P. I.
    Escobales, N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 477 - 478