A presentation of quantum logic based on an and then connective

被引:11
作者
Lehmann, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Selim & Rachel Benin Sch Comp Sci & Engn, IL-91904 Jerusalem, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
generalized Boolean algebras; non-associative Boolean algebras; non-commutative Boolean algebras; quantum measurements; measurement algebras; Quantum Logic; orthomodular lattices; modular lattices;
D O I
10.1093/logcom/exm054
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
When a physicist performs a quantic measurement, new information about the system at hand is gathered. This article studies the logical properties of how this new information is combined with previous information. It presents Quantum Logic as a propositional logic under two connectives: negation and the and then operation that combines old and new information. The and then connective is neither commutative nor associative. Many properties of this logic are exhibited, and some small elegant subset is shown to imply all the properties considered. No independence or completeness result is claimed. Classical physical systems are exactly characterized by the commutativity, the associativity, or the monotonicity of the and then connective. Entailment is defined in this logic and can be proved to be a partial order. In orthomodular lattices, the operation proposed by Finch in [3] satisfies all the properties studied in this article. All properties satisfied by Finchs; operation in modular lattices are valid in Quantum Logic. It is not known whether all properties of Quantum Logic are satisfied by Finchs; operation in modular lattices. Non-commutative, non-associative algebraic structures generalizing Boolean algebras are defined, ideals are characterized and a homomorphism theorem is proved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 76
页数:18
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   The logic of quantum mechanics [J].
Birkhoff, G ;
von Neumann, J .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS, 1936, 37 :823-843
[2]   Quantum logic, Hilbert space, revision theory [J].
Engesser, K ;
Gabbay, DM .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 136 (01) :61-100
[3]  
Finch PD, 1969, B AUSTRAL MATH SOC, V1, P333
[4]  
GREECHIE R, 1981, CURRENT ISSUES QUANT, V8, P375
[5]   NONMONOTONIC REASONING, PREFERENTIAL MODELS AND CUMULATIVE LOGICS [J].
KRAUS, S ;
LEHMANN, D ;
MAGIDOR, M .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1990, 44 (1-2) :167-207
[6]   Algebras of measurements: The logical structure of quantum mechanics [J].
Lehmann, Daniel ;
Engesser, Kurt ;
Gabbay, Dov M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 45 (04) :715-741
[7]   Solution of the Robbins problem [J].
McCune, W .
JOURNAL OF AUTOMATED REASONING, 1997, 19 (03) :263-276
[8]   QUANTUM LOGIC REVISITED [J].
ROMAN, L ;
RUMBOS, B .
FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (06) :727-734
[9]  
VONNEUMANN J, 1943, MATH GRUNDLAGEN QUAN