An Economic Analysis of the Threats Posed by the Establishment of Aedes albopictus in Brisbane, Queensland

被引:14
作者
Darbro, Jonathan [1 ]
Halasa, Yara [2 ]
Montgomery, Brian [3 ]
Muller, Mike [4 ]
Shepard, Donald [2 ]
Devine, Greg [5 ]
Mwebaze, Paul [6 ]
机构
[1] QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, 300 Herston Rd, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] Brandeis Univ, POB 549110,Mailstop MS 035,415 South St, Waltham, MA 02454 USA
[3] Metro South Publ Hlth Unit, 39 Kessels Rd, Coopers Plains, Qld 4108, Australia
[4] Brisbane City Council, Shed, 25 Green Sq Close, Fortitude Valley, Qld 4006, Australia
[5] QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, 300 Herston Rd, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[6] CSIRO Land & Water, EcoSci Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park, Qld 4102, Australia
关键词
Mosquito; Aedes albopictus; Benefit-cost analysis; Benefit transfer; Willingness to pay; Vector control; CHIKUNGUNYA VIRUS-INFECTION; ASIAN TIGER MOSQUITO; GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DENGUE; AUSTRALIA; OUTBREAK; PATTERNS; ECOLOGY; AEGYPTI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.015
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aedes albopictus is an invasive mosquito, aggressive biter and potential disease vector. Its establishment in Europe and the Americas resulted in local disease transmission and impacted quality of outdoor recreational activities. Economic implications of its likely invasion into Australia had not been considered. A benefit-cost analysis of an elimination response scenario to an Ae. albopictus incursion in Brisbane was developed with a benefits transfer estimate of the local population's willingness-to-pay for an Ae. albopictus-free environment. Other costed considerations included i) necessary precautionary vector control responses to importations of mosquito-borne diseases (e.g. dengue, Zika) and ii) projected rises in complaints to local government regarding increased mosquito nuisance. Costs of implementing a successful elimination program were estimated between 1 and 4 AU$ per capita, and the annual benefit-cost ratio regarding the value of an unaffected outdoor environment was between 50 and 78. In the event of establishment, annual costs of local government and public health responses were between 0.5 and 1.3 AU$ per capita. The recurrent expense of permanent colonization will be magnified by loss of value associated with an Ae. albopictus-free environment. We conclude it is more cost-beneficial to conduct a thorough elimination program for Ae. albopictus than to allow establishment. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 213
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   The history of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus in Australia and achievements in its control [J].
Angus, BM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY, 1996, 26 (12) :1341-1355
[2]  
[Anonymous], NT DIS CONTR B
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, QUEENSL DENG MAN PLA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, QUEENSL CHIK MAN PLA
[5]  
[Anonymous], NO TERRITORY DIS CON
[6]  
[Anonymous], GROSS DOM PROD STAT
[7]  
[Australian Bureau of Statistics Statistics A.B.o.], 2013, AUSTR NAT ACC STAT A
[8]   Spread of the tiger:: Global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus [J].
Benedict, Mark Q. ;
Levine, Rebecca S. ;
Hawley, William A. ;
Lounibos, L. Philip .
VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES, 2007, 7 (01) :76-85
[9]  
Boardman A.E., 2006, Cost-benefit analysis, concepts and practice, V3rd
[10]   The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: current knowledge and future perspectives [J].
Bonizzoni, Mariangela ;
Gasperi, Giuliano ;
Chen, Xioaguang ;
James, Anthony A. .
TRENDS IN PARASITOLOGY, 2013, 29 (09) :460-468