Renewable energy development and green public policies complementarities: The case of developed and developing countries

被引:42
作者
Carfora, A. [1 ]
Pansini, R. V. [2 ]
Romano, A. A. [1 ]
Scandurra, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Parthenope, Dept Management Studies & Quantitat Methods, Via Gen Parisi 13, I-80132 Naples, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, Econ Dept, Via Roentgen 1, I-20136 Milan, Italy
关键词
Green policies; Renewable investments; Policy complementarities; FEED-IN TARIFF; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to analyze the factors determining the choice of energy policy setting in favor of renewable energy sources. We investigate if such determinants are different between countries at different stage of development. Finally, we study if the adoption of green energy policies is characterized by complementary or substitution effects. Our analysis aims at responding at two research questions: what are the factors influencing a country's choice for a specific type of energy policy? Is it possible to identify either complementary or substitute policy interventions based on a country's level of economic development? Moreover, are developing systematically different from developed countries in manage public and private resources for renewable energies? The empirical analysis employs a panel probit model estimated over a sample of 56 countries observed between 2004 and 2011. The results show that while context variables have the same impact in developed and developing countries, public operational variables play a different role. Governments in richer countries are bound to play only a role of an arbiter. On the contrary, governments of developing countries are more directly involved in the management of energy policies. Hence, a greater impact is recognized to policies with direct involvement of the government. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 749
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Determinants of renewable energy growth: A global sample analysis [J].
Aguirre, Mariana ;
Ibikunle, Gbenga .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 69 :374-384
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Renewables 2015: Global Status Report. REN21
[3]   Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (01) :656-660
[4]   Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States [J].
Bird, L ;
Bolinger, M ;
Gagliano, T ;
Wiser, R ;
Brown, M ;
Parsons, B .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (11) :1397-1407
[5]   Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development [J].
Butler, Lucy ;
Neuhoff, Karsten .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2008, 33 (08) :1854-1867
[6]  
Chamberlain G., 1984, Handbook of econometrics, V2, P1247
[7]   Comparing the innovation effects of support schemes for renewable electricity technologies: A function of innovation approach [J].
del Rio, Pablo ;
Bleda, Mercedes .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 50 :272-282
[8]   Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development [J].
Dong, C. G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 :476-485
[9]   Energy policy: security of supply, sustainability and competition [J].
Helm, D .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (03) :173-184
[10]   Interactions between the power and green certificate markets [J].
Jensen, SG ;
Skytte, K .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (05) :425-435