The past and present of System-Theoretic Accident Model And Processes (STAMP) and its associated techniques: A scoping review

被引:64
作者
Patriarca, Riccardo [1 ]
Chatzimichailidou, Mikela [2 ]
Karanikas, Nektarios [3 ]
Di Gravio, Giulio [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[2] WSP, Rail, Syst Engn & Syst Assurance Directorate, London, England
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Work, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
STAMP; CAST; STPA; Systems-theory; Scoping review; HAZARD ANALYSIS; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; RISK-MANAGEMENT; THINKING; ACCIMAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105566
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Targeting the analysis of socio-technical complexity, the System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) was developed to engineer safer systems. Since its inception in the early 2000s, STAMP and its associated techniques, namely the System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) and the Causal Analysis based on System Theory (CAST), have attracted increasing interest as suitable approaches for safety studies. Nonetheless, a literature review on their applications is lacking. This paper fills this gap via a scoping literature survey on contributions indexed in academic journals and conference proceedings. Through a systematic analysis of 321 eligible documents, this research presents a comprehensive examination of relevant features for STAMP, STPA and CAST since 2003, such as the system type and domain of analysis, coverage and completeness of the analytical and methodological steps, respectively, as well as alterations and/or enrichments of their original versions. The bibliometric findings from primary, secondary and non-empirical research contributions are discussed to critically reflect on the past and present of STAMP and its associated techniques, and possible future directions are highlighted.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [1] Electronic medical records and risk management in hospitals of Saudi Arabia
    Al-Barnawi, Abdullah
    He, Ying
    Maglaras, Leandros A.
    Janicke, Helge
    [J]. INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE, 2019, 44 (02) : 189 - 203
  • [2] Alejandro Valdez Banda O., 2020, P INT SEM SAF SEC AU, DOI [10.2478/9788395669606, DOI 10.2478/9788395669606]
  • [3] A critical review of methods and models for evaluating organizational factors in Human Reliability Analysis
    Alvarenga, M. A. B.
    Frutuoso e Melo, P. F.
    Fonseca, R. A.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 75 : 25 - 41
  • [4] When to use the Bonferroni correction
    Armstrong, Richard A.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2014, 34 (05) : 502 - 508
  • [5] Aven T., 2015, RISK ANAL, V2nd ed.
  • [6] Bargal B., 2019, MIT STAMP WORKSH BOS
  • [7] Beaumont P., 2019, Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience: Theories, Methods, Tools and Technologies, P159, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-00024-0_9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-00024-0_9]
  • [8] Berg H. -P., 2017, SAFETY RELIABILITY T, P3145, DOI [10.1201/9781315210469-399, DOI 10.1201/9781315210469-399]
  • [9] Berg HP, 2018, SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, P249
  • [10] Statistics review 8: Qualitative data - tests of association
    Bewick, V
    Cheek, L
    Ball, J
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 8 (01): : 46 - 53