Impact assessment of anomaly propagation in a naval water distribution cyber-physical system

被引:4
作者
Pelissero, Nicolas [1 ]
Laso, Pedro Merino [2 ]
Puentes, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Navale, Chair Naval Cyber Def, Brest, France
[2] French Maritime Acad ENSM, Nantes, France
[3] IMT Atlantique, Lab STICC, UMR CNRS 6285, Brest, France
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER SECURITY AND RESILIENCE (IEEE CSR) | 2021年
关键词
Cyber-physical system; cybersecurity; propagation assessment; multilayer graph model; risk estimation; ATTACKS; RISK;
D O I
10.1109/CSR51186.2021.9527952
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are composed by multiple subsystems that encompass numerous interdependencies. Although indispensable and highly performant from a functional perspective, complex interconnectivity constitutes paradoxically a significant vulnerability when an anomaly occurs. Anomalies could propagate and impact the entire CPS with irreversible consequences. This paper presents an approach to assess the anomaly propagation impact risk on a three layers oriented graph which represents the physical, digital, and system variables of a CPS components and interdependencies. Anomalies are detected applying information quality measures, while potential propagation paths are assessed computing the cumulated risk represented by weights assigned to the graph edges. To verify the cascading impact of different anomalies four cyber-attacks - denial of service, sensor offset alteration, false data injection, and replay attack - were implemented on a simulated naval water distribution CPS. The propagation impact of three anomalies was successfully assessed and the corresponding estimated propagation path, if applicable, confirmed.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 523
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks
    Boccaletti, S.
    Bianconi, G.
    Criado, R.
    del Genio, C. I.
    Gomez-Gardenes, J.
    Romance, M.
    Sendina-Nadal, I.
    Wang, Z.
    Zanin, M.
    [J]. PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2014, 544 (01): : 1 - 122
  • [2] From Detecting Cyber-Attacks to Mitigating Risk Within a Hybrid Environment
    Foglietta, Chiara
    Masucci, Dario
    Palazzo, Cosimo
    Santini, Riccardo
    Panzieri, Stefano
    Rosa, Luis
    Cruz, Tiago
    Lev, Leonid
    [J]. IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (01): : 424 - 435
  • [3] Guan XP, 2016, IEEE-CAA J AUTOMATIC, V3, P1
  • [4] Conceptualizing the key features of cyber-physical systems in a multi-layered representation for safety and security analysis
    Guzman, Nelson H.
    Wied, Morten
    Kozine, Igor
    Lundteigen, Mary Ann
    [J]. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2020, 23 (02) : 189 - 210
  • [5] ( IMO) I. M. O, 2017, MSCFAL1CIRC3 IMO
  • [6] Jacq O, 2018, 2018 2ND CYBER SECURITY IN NETWORKING CONFERENCE (CSNET)
  • [7] Laso Pedro Merino, 2016, INT C SENS SYST SOFT, P105
  • [8] Communication Infrastructure Design in Cyber Physical Systems with Applications in Smart Grids: A Hybrid System Framework
    Li, Husheng
    Dimitrovski, Aleksandar
    Song, Ju Bin
    Han, Zhu
    Qian, Lijun
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2014, 16 (03): : 1689 - 1708
  • [9] Quantitative Risk Modeling and Analysis for Large-Scale Cyber-Physical Systems
    Malik, Adeel A.
    Tosh, Deepak K.
    [J]. 2020 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS (ICCCN 2020), 2020,
  • [10] A method for evaluating the consequence propagation of security attacks in cyber-physical systems
    Orojloo, Hamed
    Azgomi, Mohammad Abdollahi
    [J]. FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2017, 67 : 57 - 71