Impact of Peer Partner Support on Self Efficacy for Justice-Involved Parents: A Controlled Study of Juvenile Justice 101

被引:8
作者
Walker, Sarah Cusworth [1 ]
Bishop, Asia Sarah [1 ]
Trayler, Karen [2 ]
Jaeger, Ron [2 ]
Gustaveson, Steve [3 ]
Guthrie, Anne C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Div Publ Behav Hlth & Justice Policy, Seattle, WA 98102 USA
[2] Washington DADS, Mill Creek, WA USA
[3] King Cty Super Court Juvenile Court Serv, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Families; Juvenile justice; Juvenile courts; Parents; Juvenile justice 101; MENTAL-HEALTH; MISSING DATA; SOCIAL SUPPORT; COURT;
D O I
10.1007/s10826-013-9856-5
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Systems of care and other health-related initiatives have encouraged the proliferation of parent support policies in mental health, child welfare and education systems. However, the juvenile court system has relatively few programs that provide direct peer support for parents and little is known about the impact of parent support on families navigating the court process. Juvenile Justice 101 is one of only a few such programs. The present study examined the effect of the peer support element of Juvenile Justice 101 compared to video-only and no intervention conditions in a pre/post-test design. One hundred and ten parents agreed to participate in the study, 54 on a day with the peer support condition, 28 on a video-only day and 28 on a no-intervention day. Sixteen parents in the peer support condition were able to participate in the full program and seven parents in the video-only condition participated in the full video. Analyses disaggregate the effects of condition assignment and participation. Self-efficacy in navigating the juvenile court process improved for parents who participated in peer support but no improvement was observed for the other conditions. Parents in the peer support condition also rated peer partners higher than court staff on a dimension assessing process of care. The implications for practice and policy for peer support and family-driven services in juvenile court are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 454
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN SOCIAL SUPPORT CONCEPTS, MEASURES, AND MODELS [J].
BARRERA, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 14 (04) :413-445
[2]  
Barrows S. J., 1904, REPORTS PREPARED INT
[3]   An Evaluation of the NAMI Basics Program [J].
Brister, Teri ;
Cavaleri, Mary A. ;
Olin, S. Serene ;
Shen, Sa ;
Burns, Barbara J. ;
Hoagwood, Kimberly E. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2012, 21 (03) :439-442
[4]   Effective treatment for mental disorders in children and adolescents [J].
Burns B.J. ;
Hoagwood K. ;
Mrazek P.J. .
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1999, 2 (4) :199-254
[5]   Self-efficacy Is Associated With Less Burden and More Gains From Behavioral Problems of Alzheimer's Disease in Hong Kong Chinese Caregivers [J].
Cheng, Sheung-Tak ;
Lam, Linda C. W. ;
Kwok, Timothy ;
Ng, Natalie S. S. ;
Fung, Ada W. T. .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2013, 53 (01) :71-80
[6]   Get Him Out of My House: Parental Competencies of Juvenile Probationers [J].
Cook, Amy Kyle ;
Gordon, Jill A. .
YOUTH VIOLENCE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE, 2012, 10 (02) :205-223
[7]  
Davis S.M., 1997, Children and the legal system, V2nd
[8]   Measuring Individualized Parent Advocate Services in Children's Mental Health: A Contextualized Theoretical Application [J].
Davis, Tamara S. ;
Gavazzi, Stephen M. ;
Scheer, Scott D. ;
Uppal, Reena .
JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2011, 20 (05) :669-684
[9]   Parent Advocates in Children's Mental Health: Program Implementation Processes and Considerations [J].
Davis, Tamara S. ;
Scheer, Scott D. ;
Gavazzi, Stephen M. ;
Uppal, Reena .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 37 (06) :468-483
[10]   Dealing With Missing Data in Developmental Research [J].
Enders, Craig K. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 7 (01) :27-31