Goal attainment scaling as a measure of treatment success after physiotherapy for chronic low back pain

被引:21
作者
Mannion, Anne F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Caporaso, Filomena [2 ,3 ]
Pulkovski, Natascha [2 ,3 ]
Sprott, Haiko [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Spine Ctr Div, Dept Res & Dev, Schulthess Klin, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Med Phys, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Low back pain; Outcome measures; Goal attainment scaling; Physiotherapy;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/keq160
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Methods. Eleven males and 21 females [mean age 44.0 (12.3) years] with cLBP, undergoing a spine-stabilization physiotherapy programme, completed the Roland Morris (RM) Disability Scale and a 0-10 pain scale pre- and post-therapy. Post-therapy, goal attainment scaling (GAS) scores were calculated regarding achievement of 2-6 priority GAS goals established pre-therapy; global outcome of therapy was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale. Results. Approximately one-fifth of the individualized goals were not covered by items of the RM. Of the 121 individualized goals, 41 (34%) were achieved at the expected level, 42 (35%) were exceeded and 38 (31%) were not reached. GAS scores correlated with change scores for pain (r = 0.61, P < 0.0001) and RM (r = 0.49, P = 0.006). Sixty-five per cent of the patients had a successful outcome according to GAS (i.e. a score epsilon 50); 55%, according to global outcome (therapy helped/helped a lot); 39%, according to the RM score change (score decrease epsilon 30%); and 44%, according to the pain score change (score decrease epsilon 30%). Conclusions. GAS demonstrates the achievement of important goals undetected by fixed-item measures and is a valid and sensitive outcome measure for assessing the success of rehabilitation in patients with cLBP.
引用
收藏
页码:1734 / 1738
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Chapter 4 - European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain [J].
Airaksinen, O. ;
Brox, J. I. ;
Cedraschi, C. ;
Hildebrandt, J. ;
Klaber-Moffett, J. ;
Kovacs, F. ;
Mannion, A. F. ;
Reis, S. ;
Staal, J. B. ;
Ursin, H. ;
Zanoli, G. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 2) :S192-S300
[2]  
CLEARY PD, 1988, INQUIRY-J HEALTH CAR, V25, P25
[3]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[4]   Pain assessment [J].
Haefeli, M ;
Elfering, A .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 1) :S17-S24
[5]   THE PSYCHOMETRIC FOUNDATIONS OF GOAL ATTAINMENT SCALING [J].
HEAVLIN, WD ;
LEEMERROW, SW ;
LEWIS, VM .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 1982, 18 (03) :230-241
[6]   Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review [J].
Hurn, Jane ;
Kneebone, Ian ;
Cropley, Mark .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2006, 20 (09) :756-772
[7]   Effect sizes of non-surgical treatments of non-specific low-back pain [J].
Keller, A. ;
Hayden, J. ;
Bombardier, C. ;
Van Tulder, M. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (11) :1776-1788
[8]   Use of goal attainment scaling in inpatient rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis [J].
Khan, Fary ;
Pallant, Julie F. ;
Turner-Stokes, Lynn .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (04) :652-659
[9]  
Kiresuk T.J., 1994, Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement
[10]   GOAL ATTAINMENT SCALING - GENERAL METHOD FOR EVALUATING COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS [J].
KIRESUK, TJ ;
SHERMAN, RE .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 1968, 4 (06) :443-453