Trust in blockchain-based systems

被引：20
作者：
Becker, Moritz [1 ]
Bodo, Balazs [2 ]
机构：
[1] Weizenbaum Inst Networked Soc, Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源：
INTERNET POLICY REVIEW | 2021年 / 10卷 / 02期
基金：
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词：
Trust; Blockchain; BITCOIN;
D O I：
10.14763/2021.2.1555
中图分类号：
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号：
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要：
Trust can best be understood as a relational attribute between (1) a social actor and other actor(s) (interpersonal trust) and / or (2) actors and institutions (institutional or systemic trust) and (3) institutions and (trusting) actors (trust as shared expectations), where institutional frameworks define the nature and strength of trust relationships between different actors.
引用
收藏
页数：10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   In digital we trust: Bitcoin discourse, digital currencies, and decentralized network fetishism [J].
Baldwin, Jon .
PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 4
[2]  
Balkin Jack M, 2016, UCDL Review, V49, P1183
[3]  
Beck R., 2016, Proc. 24th Eur. Conf. Inf. Syst, P1
[4]   Blockchain-Based Distributed Trust and Reputation Management Systems: A Survey [J].
Bellini, Emanuele ;
Iraqi, Youssef ;
Damiani, Ernesto .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :21127-21151
[5]  
Berkeley J., 2015, THE ECONOMIST
[6]  
Blobaum B, 2016, PROGR IS, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2
[7]   Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators [J].
Bodo, Balazs .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2021, 23 (09) :2668-2690
[8]  
Botsman R., 2017, Who can you trust? How technology brought us together-and why it could drive us apart
[9]  
Brekke J. K, 2019, DISASSEMBLING TRUST
[10]  
Campbell-Verduyn M, 2018, BITCOIN CRYPTOCURREN, V1st, DOI [10.4324/9781315211909, DOI 10.4324/9781315211909]
123456