Life cycle environmental impacts of disposable medical masks

被引:32
|
作者
Turkmen, Burcin Atilgan [1 ]
机构
[1] Bilecik Seyh Edebali Univ, Dept Chem Engn, TR-11230 Bilecik, Turkey
关键词
COVID-19; Disposable masks; Cleaner production; Environmental sustainability; Life cycle assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-17430-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A massive increase in the use and production of masks worldwide has been seen in the current COVID-19 pandemic, which has contributed to reducing the transmission of the virus globally. This paper aims to evaluate the life cycle environmental impacts of disposable medical masks to identify the life cycle stages that cause the highest impact on the environment. A further goal is to estimate the total environmental impacts at the global level in 2020. The inventory data was constructed directly from the industry. The system boundary of the study is from cradle to grave comprising raw material extraction and processing, production, packaging, distribution, use, and disposal as well as transport and waste management along the supply chain. Eleven environmental impacts have been estimated. The results suggest that the global warming potential of a disposable medical mask is 0.02 g CO2-eq. for which the main contributor is the raw material supply (40.5%) followed by the packaging (30.0%) and production (15.5%). Sensitivity analysis was carried out to test the environmental impacts. In total, 52 billion disposable medical masks used worldwide consumes 22 TJ of energy in 2020. The global warming potential of disposable medical masks supplied in a year of the COVID-19 pandemic is 1.1 Mt CO2 eq. This paper assessed the hotspots in the medical mask. The findings of this study will be of interest to policymakers, global mask manufacturers, and users, allowing them to make more informed decisions about the medical mask industry.
引用
收藏
页码:25496 / 25506
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle environmental impacts of consumer packaging products in Japan
    Pragati, Pooja
    Yasunobu, Maeda
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2023, 43 (08) : 1682 - 1693
  • [22] Life-cycle environmental impacts of barley straw valorisation
    Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo
    Rahimifard, Shahin
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 149 : 1 - 11
  • [23] Environmental impacts of the transition to automated vehicles: A life cycle perspective
    Obaid, Lubna
    Alattieh, Sara A.
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Hamad, Khaled
    SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 38
  • [24] Life cycle environmental impacts of urban water systems in China
    Xu, Hao
    Fu, Guangtao
    Ye, Qian
    Lyu, Mei
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    WATER RESEARCH, 2024, 266
  • [25] Environmental footprints of disposable and reusable personal protective equipment-a product life cycle approach for body coveralls
    Snigdha
    Hiloidhari, Moonmoon
    Bandyopadhyay, Somnath
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 394
  • [26] Environmental impacts of valorisation of crude glycerol from biodiesel production - A life cycle perspective
    Tomatis, Marco
    Jeswani, Harish Kumar
    Azapagic, Adisa
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 179 : 55 - 65
  • [27] Environmental Impacts of Egg Production from a Life Cycle Perspective
    Guillaume, Aurore
    Hubatova-Vackova, Anna
    Koci, Vladimir
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [28] Environmental considerations in the selection of isolation gowns: A life cycle assessment of reusable and disposable alternatives
    Vozzola, Eric
    Overcash, Michael
    Griffing, Evan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2018, 46 (08) : 881 - 886
  • [29] Adverse environmental effects of disposable face masks due to the excess usage
    Li, Alice Sim Hui
    Sathishkumar, Palanivel
    Selahuddeen, Muhammad Luqman
    Mahmood, Wan M. Asyraf Wan
    Abidin, Mohamad Hamdi Zainal
    Wahab, Roswanira Abdul
    Huri, Mohamad Afiq Mohamed
    Abdullah, Faizuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2022, 308
  • [30] Disposable over Reusable Face Masks: Public Safety or Environmental Disaster?
    Prata, Joana C.
    Silva, Ana L. Patricio
    Duarte, Armando C.
    Rocha-Santos, Teresa
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 8 (04)