Life cycle environmental impacts of disposable medical masks

被引:38
作者
Turkmen, Burcin Atilgan [1 ]
机构
[1] Bilecik Seyh Edebali Univ, Dept Chem Engn, TR-11230 Bilecik, Turkey
关键词
COVID-19; Disposable masks; Cleaner production; Environmental sustainability; Life cycle assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-17430-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A massive increase in the use and production of masks worldwide has been seen in the current COVID-19 pandemic, which has contributed to reducing the transmission of the virus globally. This paper aims to evaluate the life cycle environmental impacts of disposable medical masks to identify the life cycle stages that cause the highest impact on the environment. A further goal is to estimate the total environmental impacts at the global level in 2020. The inventory data was constructed directly from the industry. The system boundary of the study is from cradle to grave comprising raw material extraction and processing, production, packaging, distribution, use, and disposal as well as transport and waste management along the supply chain. Eleven environmental impacts have been estimated. The results suggest that the global warming potential of a disposable medical mask is 0.02 g CO2-eq. for which the main contributor is the raw material supply (40.5%) followed by the packaging (30.0%) and production (15.5%). Sensitivity analysis was carried out to test the environmental impacts. In total, 52 billion disposable medical masks used worldwide consumes 22 TJ of energy in 2020. The global warming potential of disposable medical masks supplied in a year of the COVID-19 pandemic is 1.1 Mt CO2 eq. This paper assessed the hotspots in the medical mask. The findings of this study will be of interest to policymakers, global mask manufacturers, and users, allowing them to make more informed decisions about the medical mask industry.
引用
收藏
页码:25496 / 25506
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Characterization of littered face masks in the southeastern part of Turkey [J].
Akarsu, Ceyhun ;
Madenli, Ozgecan ;
Deveci, Ece Ummu .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (34) :47517-47527
[2]  
Allison A, 2020, UCL OPEN ENV TIME, DOI DOI 10.14324/111.444/000031.V1
[3]   Coronavirus outbreak in Nigeria: Burden and socio-medical response during the first 100 days [J].
Amzat, Jimoh ;
Aminu, Kafayat ;
Kolo, Victor, I ;
Akinyele, Ayodele A. ;
Ogundairo, Janet A. ;
Danjibo, Maryann C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 98 :218-224
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ECB communication to reporting agents on the collection of statistical information in the context of COVID-19
[5]  
Baumann H., 2004, HITCH HIKERS GUIDE L, P19
[6]  
CEN, 2019, 146832019AC CEN
[7]  
Chan E, 2020, DISPOSABLE FACE MASK
[8]   Face Masks in the New COVID-19 Normal: Materials, Testing, and Perspectives [J].
Chua, Ming Hui ;
Cheng, Weiren ;
Goh, Shermin Simin ;
Kong, Junhua ;
Li, Bing ;
Lim, Jason Y. C. ;
Mao, Lu ;
Wang, Suxi ;
Xue, Kun ;
Yang, Le ;
Ye, Enyi ;
Zhang, Kangyi ;
Cheong, Wun Chet Davy ;
Tan, Beng Hoon ;
Li, Zibiao ;
Tan, Ban Hock ;
Loh, Xian Jun .
RESEARCH, 2020, 2020
[9]  
CML, 2016, CML IA CHAR FACT
[10]   Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? [J].
Davies, Anna ;
Thompson, Katy-Anne ;
Giri, Karthika ;
Kafatos, George ;
Walker, Jimmy ;
Bennett, Allan .
DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2013, 7 (04) :413-418