Immediately loaded single-implant mandibular overdentures compared to conventional complete dentures: A cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:3
作者
Nogueira, Tulio Eduardo [1 ]
Silva, Jesio Rodrigues [1 ]
Nascimento, Lays Noleto [1 ]
Cardoso, Joyce Borges [1 ]
Srinivasan, Murali [2 ]
McKenna, Gerald [3 ]
Leles, Claudio Rodrigues [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Dent, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Gen Special Care & Geriatr Dent, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Queens Univ, Ctr Publ Hlth, Sch Med Dent & Biomed Sci, Inst Clin Sci, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Edentulism; Complete denture; Dental implant; Overdenture; Economic evaluation; Cost-effectiveness; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; RETAINED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL; SATISFACTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103846
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: In recent years, the single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) has been proposed as an alternative to more complex overdenture designs as a simplified implant intervention for edentulous patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to run a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial comparing the SIMO and the conventional complete denture (CCD) treatment. Imediately loaded external hexagon implant and ball attachment were used for the overdenture goup. Direct costs related to therapies were identified and valuated throughout a 1-year period after delivery, in Brazilian currency (R$) and converted into international dollars (I$) using purchase power parity exchange rates. Treatment effectiveness was measured using the OHIP-Edent and satisfaction scores for calculation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Results: Outcomes were assessed at the 1-year follow-up for 65 patients (CCD=34; SIMO=31). Overall OHIPEdent and satisfaction scores improved significantly in the SIMO group, while remained unchanged in the CCD group. The mean overall costs were R$1,179.04 (I$590.99) for the CCD group and R$2,127.91 (I$1,068.20) for the SIMO group - 80.7% incremental cost for SIMO. The ICER calculation for SIMO treatment showed a mean cost of I$48.20 for 1-point reduction in OHIP-Edent scores, and I$12.56 for 1-point increase in satisfaction score. Conclusions: Findings support the effectiveness of this simplified and low-cost implant intervention for edentulous patients. SIMO also seems a cost-effective alternative to the CCD and the relatively low incremental cost may potentially increase the utilization of dental implants among older subjects, especially those with limited financial resources. Clinical significance: The immediately loaded single-implant mandibular overdenture was superior to the conventional complete denture in terms of patient-reported outcome measures at a low incremental cost.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]   A comparison of cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of two- implant-retained overdentures versus other removable prosthodontic treatment options for edentulous mandible: A systematic review [J].
Roy, Shubhabrata ;
Maji, Sourav ;
Paul, Rahul ;
Bhattacharyya, Jayanta ;
Goel, Preeti .
JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2020, 20 (02) :162-170
[32]   Effect of advanced age and/or systemic medical conditions on dental implant survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Schimmel, Martin ;
Srinivasan, Murali ;
McKenna, Gerald ;
Mueller, Frauke .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 :311-330
[33]   The economics of dentistry: a neglected concern [J].
Shariati, Batoul ;
MacEntee, Michael I. ;
Yazdizadeh, Maryam .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 41 (05) :385-394
[34]  
Smith P.G., 2015, FIELD TRIALS HLTH IN
[35]   Exploratory factor analysis of the Brazilian OHIP for edentulous subjects [J].
Souza, R. F. ;
Leles, C. R. ;
Guyatt, G. H. ;
Pontes, C. B. ;
Della Vecchia, M. P. ;
Neves, F. D. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 37 (03) :202-208
[36]   Two implant retained overdentures-A review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements [J].
Thomason, J. M. ;
Kelly, S. A. M. ;
Bendkowski, A. ;
Ellis, J. S. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 (01) :22-34
[37]   Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients - the York Consensus Statement [J].
Thomason, J. Mark ;
Feine, Jocelyne ;
Exley, Catherine ;
Moynihan, Paula ;
Mueller, Frauke ;
Naert, Ignace ;
Ellis, Janice S. ;
Barclay, Craig ;
Butterworth, Chris ;
Scott, Brendan ;
Lynch, Christopher ;
Stewardson, Dominic ;
Smith, Philip ;
Welfare, Richard ;
Hyde, Paul ;
McAndrew, Robert ;
Fenlon, Michael ;
Barclay, Stewart ;
Barker, Dean .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2009, 207 (04) :185-186
[38]   Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal of Economic Evaluation Publications in Dentistry [J].
Tonmukayakul, U. ;
Calache, H. ;
Clark, R. ;
Wasiak, J. ;
Faggion, C. M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2015, 94 (10) :1348-1354
[39]   Achieving affordable critical care in low-income and middle-income countries [J].
Turner, Hugo C. ;
Nguyen Van Hao ;
Yacoub, Sophie ;
Van Minh Tu Hoang ;
Clifton, David A. ;
Thwaites, Guy E. ;
Dondorp, Arjen M. ;
Thwaites, C. Louise ;
Nguyen Van Vinh Chau .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (03)
[40]   Rehabilitation of oral function with removable dentures - still an option? [J].
Xie, Q. ;
Ding, T. ;
Yang, G. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 42 (03) :234-242