Immediately loaded single-implant mandibular overdentures compared to conventional complete dentures: A cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:3
作者
Nogueira, Tulio Eduardo [1 ]
Silva, Jesio Rodrigues [1 ]
Nascimento, Lays Noleto [1 ]
Cardoso, Joyce Borges [1 ]
Srinivasan, Murali [2 ]
McKenna, Gerald [3 ]
Leles, Claudio Rodrigues [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Dent, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Gen Special Care & Geriatr Dent, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Queens Univ, Ctr Publ Hlth, Sch Med Dent & Biomed Sci, Inst Clin Sci, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Edentulism; Complete denture; Dental implant; Overdenture; Economic evaluation; Cost-effectiveness; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; RETAINED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL; SATISFACTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103846
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: In recent years, the single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) has been proposed as an alternative to more complex overdenture designs as a simplified implant intervention for edentulous patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to run a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial comparing the SIMO and the conventional complete denture (CCD) treatment. Imediately loaded external hexagon implant and ball attachment were used for the overdenture goup. Direct costs related to therapies were identified and valuated throughout a 1-year period after delivery, in Brazilian currency (R$) and converted into international dollars (I$) using purchase power parity exchange rates. Treatment effectiveness was measured using the OHIP-Edent and satisfaction scores for calculation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Results: Outcomes were assessed at the 1-year follow-up for 65 patients (CCD=34; SIMO=31). Overall OHIPEdent and satisfaction scores improved significantly in the SIMO group, while remained unchanged in the CCD group. The mean overall costs were R$1,179.04 (I$590.99) for the CCD group and R$2,127.91 (I$1,068.20) for the SIMO group - 80.7% incremental cost for SIMO. The ICER calculation for SIMO treatment showed a mean cost of I$48.20 for 1-point reduction in OHIP-Edent scores, and I$12.56 for 1-point increase in satisfaction score. Conclusions: Findings support the effectiveness of this simplified and low-cost implant intervention for edentulous patients. SIMO also seems a cost-effective alternative to the CCD and the relatively low incremental cost may potentially increase the utilization of dental implants among older subjects, especially those with limited financial resources. Clinical significance: The immediately loaded single-implant mandibular overdenture was superior to the conventional complete denture in terms of patient-reported outcome measures at a low incremental cost.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Minimal intervention dentistry for partially dentate older adults
    Allen, Patrick Finbarr
    Da Mata, Cristiane
    Hayes, Martina
    [J]. GERODONTOLOGY, 2019, 36 (02) : 92 - 98
  • [2] Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    Payne, Alan G. T.
    De Silva, Rohana K.
    Thomson, W. Murray
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) : 330 - 337
  • [3] EAO consensus conference: economic evaluation of implant-supported prostheses
    Beikler, Thomas
    Flemmig, Thomas F.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 : 57 - 63
  • [4] A 5-Year Randomized Trial to Compare 1 or 2 Implants for Implant Overdentures
    Bryant, S. R.
    Walton, J. N.
    MacEntee, M. I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2015, 94 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [5] Treatment planning of the edentulous mandible
    Chee, W.
    Jivraj, S.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2006, 201 (06) : 337 - 347
  • [6] Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments
    Cheng, Tao
    Sun, Guifeng
    Huo, Jingyu
    He, Xiaoji
    Wang, Yining
    Ren, Yan-Fang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 (11) : 1018 - 1023
  • [7] Interpreting the Results of Cost-Effectiveness Studies
    Cohen, David J.
    Reynolds, Matthew R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (25) : 2119 - 2126
  • [8] Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: A five-year prospective study
    Cordioli, C
    Majzoub, Z
    Castagna, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1997, 78 (02) : 159 - 165
  • [9] Cordioli G P, 1993, Minerva Stomatol, V42, P469
  • [10] Coutinho P.C., J PROSTHET DENT, V24, DOI [10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.007. S0022-3913(21)00044-5, DOI 10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2021.01.007.S0022-3913(21)00044-5]