Seismic response of nonlinear soil-structure interaction systems through the Preisach formalism: the Messina Bell Tower case study

被引:8
作者
Cacciola, P. [1 ]
Calio, I [2 ]
Fiorini, N. [3 ]
Occhipinti, G. [4 ]
Spina, D. [3 ]
Tombari, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brighton, Sch Architecture Technol & Engn, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ Catania, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Catania, Italy
[3] Seism Risk Off, Dept Civil Protect, Rome, Italy
[4] CNR, Inst Environm Geol & Geoengn, Rome, Italy
关键词
Nonlinear soil-structure interaction; Preisach model; Soil hysteresis; Harmonic balance; Messina bell tower; MODEL; IDENTIFICATION; FERROMAGNETS; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; VIBRATION; CONCRETE; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-021-01268-w
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In this paper the seismic response of linear behaving structures resting on compliant soil is addressed through the application of the Preisach formalism to capture the soil nonlinearities. The novel application of the Preisach model of hysteresis for nonlinear soil-structure interaction problems is explored through the study of the seismic response of a real structure. Through a harmonic balance procedure, furthermore, simplified nonlinear springs and dashpots are derived in closed form for a ready and accurate evaluation of the nonlinear soil-structure interaction response. The selected case study is the bell tower of the Messina Cathedral in Italy. The Bell Tower hosts the largest and most complex mechanical and astronomical clock in the world and it has been recently equipped by a permanent seismic monitoring system. A pertinent finite element (FE) model including the superstructure and the soil underneath, has been defined using authentic drawings and engineering design reports. The modal properties of the FE model have been compared with the experimental ones, identified from environmental noise recorded through the seismic monitoring system. Furthermore, the FE model has been validated by means of acceleration time histories recorded at different floors during two independent seismic events. A nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis of the Bell Tower has been also performed. The seismic response obtained by the complete FE analysis, has been compared with the proposed Preisach lumped parameter model, assembled with nonlinear springs and nonlinear dashpots. The results are well in agreement, offering an alternative promising strategy for the nonlinear soil-structure interaction studies.
引用
收藏
页码:3485 / 3514
页数:30
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
ADINA, 2020, ADINA AUT DYN INCR N
[2]   Stress-Strain Model for Low-Strength Concrete in Uni-Axial Compression [J].
Ahmad, Sohaib ;
Pilakoutas, Kypros ;
Khan, Qaiser Uz Zaman ;
Neocleous, Kyriacos .
ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 40 (02) :313-328
[3]   An investigation into the Winkler modeling of the cyclic response of rigid footings [J].
Allotey, Nil ;
El Naggar, M. Hesham .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2008, 28 (01) :44-57
[4]   Seismic analysis of motorway bridges accounting for key structural components and nonlinear soil-structure interaction [J].
Anastasopoulos, I. ;
Sakellariadis, L. ;
Agalianos, A. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 78 :127-141
[5]   Simplified approximate method for analysis of rocking systems accounting for soil inelasticity and foundation uplifting [J].
Anastasopoulos, I. ;
Kontoroupi, Th. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2014, 56 :28-43
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 4117 ASCESEI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, P2091 FEMA, P218
[8]   Seismic response analysis of a nuclear reactor structure considering nonlinear soil-structure interaction [J].
Bhaumik, Lopamudra ;
Raychowdhury, Prishati .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2013, 265 :1078-1090
[9]   Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses [J].
Boulanger, RW ;
Curras, CJ ;
Kutter, BL ;
Wilson, DW ;
Abghari, A .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 125 (09) :750-759
[10]  
British Standards Institution. European Committee for Standardization. British Standards Institution. Standards Policy and Strategy Committee, 2005, 8 BRIT STAND I EUR C