Joint Perception After Total Hip Arthroplasty and the Forgotten Joint

被引:36
作者
Puliero, Benjamin [1 ]
Blakeney, William G. [1 ]
Beaulieu, Yann [1 ]
Vendittoli, Pascal-Andre [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Maison Neuve Rosemont, CIUSSS de LEst de LIle de Montreal, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; joint perception; patient-reported outcome measures; Forgotten Joint Score; WOMAC; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; SCORE; VALIDATION; IMPROVEMENT; RELIABILITY; AWARENESS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.086
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Assessing patients' functional outcomes following total hip arthroplasty with traditional scoring systems is limited by their ceiling effects. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has been suggested as a more discriminating option. The actual score in the FJS which constitutes a "forgotten joint," however, has not been defined. The emerging concept of joint perception led to the development of the Patient's Joint Perception question (PJP) to assess the patient's opinion of their prosthetic joint. Methods: Two hundred fifty-seven total hip arthroplasties were assessed at a mean of 68 months of follow-up (range 57-79). Outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), FJS, and PJP. Correlation of the scores as well as the ceiling effects were analyzed. Results: The mean FJS was 88.5 (range 27.1-100). PJP was correlated with the FJS and WOMAC (Spearman's rho -0.510 and 0.465, respectively). Fifty-two percent of the patients felt their hip as a natural joint (FJS: 95% confidence interval [CI] 93.3-96.0), 24.1% as an artificial joint with no restriction (FJS: 95% CI 83.1-90.5), and 23.3% as an artificial joint with minor restrictions (FJS: 95% CI 73.8-82.2). Only 0.8% had major restrictions and none reported a non-functional joint. The ceiling effect was high with both the WOMAC and FJS, with 27.2% and 31.9%. In addition, 28.6% of the patients had a WOMAC > 10 and 23.4% an FJS < 90 while reporting having a natural hip. Furthermore, 21.5% with a perfect WOMAC or 21.9% with a perfect FJS reported having an artificial joint with or without limitation. Conclusion: A forgotten hip perception corresponds to an FJS > 93. In 20%-30% of the cases, the WOMAC and FJS failed to identify the forgotten joint, or reached the maximum score when the patients did not feel their hip was natural. The PJP is a simple and reliable tool that enables identification of patients who feel replaced hip is natural. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 70
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Validation of the German Forgotten Joint Score (G-FJS']JS) according to the COSMIN checklist: does a reduction in joint awareness indicate clinical improvement after arthroplasty of the knee? [J].
Baumann, Florian ;
Ernstberger, Toni ;
Loibl, Markus ;
Zeman, Florian ;
Nerlich, Michael ;
Tibesku, Carsten .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2016, 136 (02) :257-264
[2]   The "Forgotten Joint" as the Ultimate Goal in Joint Arthroplasty Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure [J].
Behrend, Henrik ;
Giesinger, Karlmeinrad ;
Giesinger, Johannes M. ;
Kuster, Markus S. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (03) :430-436
[3]  
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[4]   John Charnley Award: Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Function After THA [J].
Berliner, Jonathan L. ;
Brodke, Dane J. ;
Chan, Vanessa ;
SooHoo, Nelson F. ;
Bozic, Kevin J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (02) :321-329
[5]   Comparing Patient Outcomes After THA and TKA Is There a Difference? [J].
Bourne, Robert B. ;
Chesworth, Bert ;
Davis, Aileen ;
Mahomed, Nizar ;
Charron, Kory .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (02) :542-546
[6]   When Does the Knee Feel Normal Again: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing the Forgotten Joint Score in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Carlson, Victor R. ;
Post, Zachary D. ;
Orozco, Fabio R. ;
Davis, Destiny M. ;
Lutz, Rex W. ;
Ong, Alvin C. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (03) :700-703
[7]   Joint perception after hip or knee replacement surgery [J].
Collins, M. ;
Lavigne, M. ;
Girard, J. ;
Vendittoli, P. -A. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2012, 98 (03) :275-280
[8]   Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Carr, A ;
Murray, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (02) :185-190
[9]   Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires [J].
Edwards, Philip James ;
Roberts, Ian ;
Clarke, Mike J. ;
DiGuiseppi, Carolyn ;
Wentz, Reinhard ;
Kwan, Irene ;
Cooper, Rachel ;
Felix, Lambert M. ;
Pratap, Sarah .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (03)
[10]   Risk Factors for Revision of Hip Arthroplasties in Patients Younger Than 30 Years [J].
Girard, Julien ;
Glorion, Christophe ;
Bonnomet, Francois ;
Fron, Damien ;
Migaud, Henri .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (04) :1141-1147