Individual choice of building material for nest construction by worker ants and the collective outcome for their colony

被引:15
作者
Aleksiev, Antony S.
Longdon, Ben
Christmas, Matthew J.
Sendova-Franks, Ana B.
Franks, Nigel R.
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol BS8 1UG, Avon, England
[2] Univ W England, Sch Math Sci, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
关键词
ant; building; collective decision; individual choice; Temnothorax albipennis;
D O I
10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.019
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Animal groups can gather disproportionately more information and often outperform solitary individuals in ecologically important activities. Collective decisions, however, may involve costly mechanisms for reaching a consensus. Nest building is a prime example. In a previous study on foraging for building materials by the ant Temnothorax albipennis, we showed that colonies prefer larger building blocks ( bigger sand grains) at all distances but always collect some smaller building blocks too. Walls made of mixtures of big and small grains are stronger and more compact. Here we study colonies with marked individuals to look at the foraging decisions of individuals that underlie the collective outcome for the colony. We found that at short distances some foragers preferred big grains and others small grains. However, at longer distances the proportion of foragers preferring big grains increased, whereas no foragers preferred small grains at the greatest distance. We found no evidence of an effect of individual morphology or foraging experience on preference. At all three distances foragers assessed grains before making a choice and were more likely to choose a big grain as a consequence. This likelihood increased with increasing distance. However, even at the greatest distance ants included small grains in the final wall after their initial preference for big grains. Therefore, we conclude that individual decisions to retrieve small grains are not simply errors. Instead, the construction itself may provide cues for the organization of the foraging activity of individuals into the collective building of an approximately optimal mixed wall by the colony. (C) 2007 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 566
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] The selection of building material for wall construction by ants
    Aleksiev, Antony S.
    Sendova-Franks, Ana B.
    Franks, Nigel R.
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2007, 73 : 779 - 788
  • [2] Food distance and its effect on nutrient balancing in a mobile insect herbivore
    Behmer, ST
    Cox, E
    Raubenheimer, D
    Simpson, SJ
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 66 : 665 - 675
  • [3] The effects of a limited memory capacity on foraging behavior
    Belisle, C
    Cresswell, J
    [J]. THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (01) : 78 - 90
  • [4] Berezikov E, 2000, GENOME BIOL, V1
  • [5] Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids
    Bernays, EA
    Funk, DJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 266 (1415) : 151 - 156
  • [6] The value of being a resource specialist: Behavioral support for a neural hypothesis
    Bernays, EA
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1998, 151 (05) : 451 - 464
  • [7] Burns James G., 2005, Animal Behaviour, V70, pe1, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.002
  • [8] Camazine S., 2001, SELF ORG BIOL SYSTEM
  • [9] Consensus decision making in animals
    Conradt, L
    Roper, TJ
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2005, 20 (08) : 449 - 456
  • [10] Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology
    Dall, SRX
    Giraldeau, LA
    Olsson, O
    McNamara, JM
    Stephens, DW
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2005, 20 (04) : 187 - 193