Response shift due to diagnosis and primary treatment of localized prostate cancer: a then-test and a vignette study

被引:49
作者
Korfage, Ida J. [1 ]
de Koning, Harry J. [1 ]
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mec Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
patient-reported outcome; prostate cancer; quality of life; response shift;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-007-9265-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Whether a prostate cancer diagnosis induces response shift has not been established so far. Therefore, we assessed response shift in men who were diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Out of 3,892 men who completed a questionnaire before screening, 82 were subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer. Response shift was assessed in 52 (response 63%) by the then-test (EuroQol self-rating of health, Short-Form 36 mental health and vitality) and a novel method: rating of vignettes relating to side effects of prostate cancer treatment (urinary, bowel and erectile dysfunction). Three then-tests were conducted: two referencing pre-diagnosis (measured pre- and post-treatment), and one referencing pre-treatment (measured post-treatment). Then-test scores of pre-diagnosis health were significantly higher than original scores, indicating a more positive judgement in retrospect. Then-test scores of pre-treatment health were lower than original scores. Especially the vignette on erectile dysfunction was rated less bad after diagnosis versus before (P < 0.001, moderate effect size). We found evidence for response shift in men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Men evaluated urinary, bowel, and erectile dysfunction as less bad after they had become patients who can expect to experience these side effects. The rating of vignettes is a promising additional technique to assess response shift.
引用
收藏
页码:1627 / 1634
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[2]  
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[3]   The danger of applying group-level utilities in decision analyses of the treatment of localized prostate cancer in individual patients [J].
Cowen, ME ;
Miles, BJ ;
Cahill, DF ;
Giesler, RB ;
Beck, JR ;
Kattan, MW .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) :376-380
[4]   Patients' perceptions of the side-effects of prostate cancer treatment - A qualitative interview study [J].
Korfage, Ida Joanna ;
Hak, Tony ;
de Koning, Harry J. ;
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (04) :911-919
[5]   Prostate cancer diagnosis:: The impact on patients' mental health [J].
Korfage, IJ ;
de Koning, HJ ;
Roobol, M ;
Schröder, FH ;
Essink-Bot, ML .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (02) :165-170
[6]  
Kramer Karen M, 2005, Clin Prostate Cancer, V4, P15, DOI 10.3816/CGC.2005.n.007
[7]  
LEPORE SJ, 2000, ADAPTATION CHANGING
[8]   Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies [J].
Norman, GR .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (03) :239-249
[9]   Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life - The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation [J].
Norman, GR ;
Sloan, JA ;
Wyrwich, KW .
MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (05) :582-592
[10]   Prospective vs retrospective assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with advanced prostate cancer: the effect of 'response shift' [J].
Rees, J ;
Waldron, D ;
O'Boyle, C ;
Ewings, P ;
MacDonagh, R .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (07) :703-706