Abandonment of natural gas production and investment in carbon storage

被引:10
作者
Hauck, Dominic [1 ]
Hof, Andries F. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies TVM, Boelelaan 1087, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, POB 30314, NL-2500 GH The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Heidelberglaan 2, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Exchange option; CCS; Mature and depleted gas fields; Option value; Mitigation; CO2; SEQUESTRATION; CAPTURE; RETROFITS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Long-term mitigation scenarios rely heavily on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) for achieving ambitious climate change targets. The amount of CO2 storage in these scenarios depends on the CO2 price and exogenously determined availability and costs of storage capacity. We analyze investment in CCS in more detail by taking the opportunity costs of CO2 storage into account, assuming that CO2 injection and resource extraction are mutually exclusive. Using real option valuation, we study the impact of i) correlation between gas and CO2 prices, volatility of CO2 prices, and regulatory deadlines on the value of the option to invest in CCS. We find that the value of the option to exchange gas production for CO2 injection is decreasing in the correlation of gas and CO2 prices, but increasing in the volatility of CO2 prices, and in shorter regulatory deadlines for removal of gas production facilities. This implies that next to consistent and high pricing of CO2, extending the deadline for removal of gas production facilities could increase the incentive to invest in CO2 storage in mature gas fields. We argue that considering these dynamics in mitigation scenarios could lead to more realistic projections of CCS application.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 329
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, FCCC CP 2015 L 9 REV
[2]   A review on well integrity issues for CO2 geological storage and enhanced gas recovery [J].
Bai, Mingxing ;
Zhang, Zhichao ;
Fu, Xiaofei .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 59 :920-926
[3]   Capture-ready coal plants - Options, technologies and economics [J].
Bohm, Mark C. ;
Herzog, Howard J. ;
Parsons, John E. ;
Sekar, Ram C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (01) :113-120
[4]   Numerical Evaluation of Multivariate Contingent Claims [J].
Boyle, Phelim P. ;
Evnine, Jeremy ;
Gibbs, Stephen .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1989, 2 (02) :241-250
[5]  
Breunese J., 2008, TECHNICAL REPORT
[6]  
Clarke L, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P413
[7]   THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL COST [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1960, 3 (OCT) :1-44
[8]  
Dixit K., 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN
[9]  
Freund P, 2001, GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, P272
[10]   Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty [J].
Fuss, Sabine ;
Szolgayova, Jana ;
Obersteiner, Michael ;
Gusti, Mykola .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2008, 85 (08) :708-721