Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation: A systematic review

被引:42
作者
Wilson, W. T. [1 ,2 ]
Hopper, G. P. [2 ]
Banger, M. S. [1 ]
Blyth, M. J. G. [2 ]
Riches, P. E. [1 ]
MacKay, G. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Biomed Engn, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Rosshall Hosp, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
ACL; Primary; Repair; Suture; Augmentation; Internalbrace; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; INJURY; SPORT; RETURN; STATE; RISK; KOOS;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2022.03.009
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures has re-emerged as a treatment option for proximal tears, with internal brace augmentation often utilised. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current evidence presenting outcomes of ACL repair with internal bracing to assess the safety and efficacy of this technique.Methods: All studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears, augmented with internal bracing from 2014-2021 were included. Primary outcome was failure rate and secondary outcomes were subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective assessment of anteroposterior knee laxity.Results: Nine studies were included, consisting of 347 patients, mean age 32.5 years, mean minimum follow up 2 years. There were 36 failures (10.4%, CI 7.4% -14.1%). PROMs reporting was variable across studies. KOOS, Lysholm and IKDC scores were most frequently used with mean scores > 87%. The mean Tegner and Marx scores at follow-up were 6.1 and 7.8 respectively. The mean side to side difference measured for anteroposterior knee laxity was 1.2mm. Conclusions: This systematic review with meta-analysis shows that ACL repair with internal bracing is a safe technique for treatment of proximal ruptures, with a failure rate of 10.4%. Subjective scores and clinical laxity testing also revealed satisfactory results. This suggests that ACL repair with internal bracing should be considered as an alternative to ACL reconstruction for acute proximal tears, with the potential benefits of retained native tissue and proprioception, as well as negating the need for graft harvest.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 200
页数:9
相关论文
共 83 条
[31]   Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: The Current Status [J].
Hughes, Jonathan D. ;
Lawton, Cort D. ;
Nawabi, Danyal H. ;
Pearle, Andrew D. ;
Musahl, Volker .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2020, 102 (21) :1900-1915
[32]   Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: outcomes of the first 56 consecutive patients and the role of additional internal bracing [J].
Jonkergouw, Anne ;
van der List, Jelle P. ;
DiFelice, Gregory S. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2019, 27 (01) :21-28
[33]   Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Systematic Review from the Scientific Anterior Cruciate Ligament Network International Study Group [J].
Kandhari, Vikram ;
Vieira, Thais Dutra ;
Ouanezar, Herve ;
Praz, Cesar ;
Rosenstiel, Nikolaus ;
Pioger, Charles ;
Franck, Florent ;
Saithna, Adnan ;
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (02) :594-612
[34]   PRIMARY SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURES - A LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
KAPLAN, N ;
WICKIEWICZ, TL ;
WARREN, RF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1990, 18 (04) :354-358
[35]   Basic science of anterior cruciate ligament injury and repair [J].
Kiapour, A. M. ;
Murray, M. M. .
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2014, 3 (02) :20-31
[36]   Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Versus Primary Reconstruction of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Study [J].
Koesters, Clemens ;
Glasbrenner, Johannes ;
Spickermann, Lena ;
Kittl, Christoph ;
Domnick, Christoph ;
Herbort, Mirco ;
Raschke, Michael J. ;
Schliemann, Benedikt .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (05) :1108-1116
[37]   EVALUATION OF KNEE LIGAMENT SURGERY RESULTS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON USE OF A SCORING SCALE [J].
LYSHOLM, J ;
GILLQUIST, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1982, 10 (03) :150-154
[38]  
Mackay Gordon M, 2015, Surg Technol Int, V26, P239
[39]   Anterior cruciate ligament repair – past, present and future [J].
Mahapatra P. ;
Horriat S. ;
Anand B.S. .
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 5 (1)
[40]   A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: "Back to the Future" or Another Trend? [J].
Malahias, Michael-Alexander ;
Chytas, Dimitrios ;
Nakamura, Kaori ;
Raoulis, Vasileios ;
Yokota, Masashi ;
Nikolaou, Vasileios S. .
SPORTS MEDICINE-OPEN, 2018, 4