Modeling the Dynamics of Enterprise Architecture Adoption Process

被引:5
作者
Syynimaa, Nestori [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Informat Res Ctr, Reading, Berks, England
[2] Univ Tampere, Sch Informat Sci, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
[3] CSC IT Ctr Sci, Espoo, Finland
[4] Gerenios Ltd, Tampere, Finland
来源
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICEIS 2015) | 2015年 / 241卷
关键词
Enterprise Architecture; Adoption; Change resistance; Strategic level; Organisational change; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-29133-8_28
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
During the last few years Enterprise Architecture (EA) has received increasing attention among industry and academia. EA can be defined as a formal description of the current and future state(s) of the organisation, and as a managed changes between these states. By adopting EA, organisations may gain a number of benefits such as better decision making, increased revenues and cost reduction, and alignment of business and IT. Despite of the benefits, EA is not widely adopted in organisations. One of the reasons for this is that the adoption has been found to be difficult. In this paper a model to explain the complex dynamics of EA adoption is introduced. The model of the Resistance during the EA adoption Process (REAP) is based on selected EA literature and on general organisational change and change resistance literature. The model introduces novel relationships between strategic level of EA, resulting organisational changes, and the sources of resistance during the planning and execution phases of the adoption. REAP is validated empirically using data collected from an EA-pilot conducted among 11 Finnish higher education institutions. Validation revealed that most of the resistance faced during the adoption was caused by the lack of EA knowledge. By utilising REAP model, organisations may anticipate and prepare for the organisational change resistance during EA adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 594
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   Three Schools of Thought on Enterprise Arthitecture [J].
Lapalme, James .
IT PROFESSIONAL, 2012, 14 (06) :37-43
[32]   Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years [J].
Lee, Allen S. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 25 (04) :336-348
[33]  
Lemmetti Juha, 2012, Electronic Government. Proceedings of the 11th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2012, P162, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_14
[34]  
Mezzanotte Dominic M. Sr., 2010, 2010 IEEE/ACIS 9th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS 2010), P859, DOI 10.1109/ICIS.2010.58
[35]   Change Recipients' Reactions to Organizational Change: A 60-Year Review of Quantitative Studies [J].
Oreg, Shaul ;
Vakola, Maria ;
Armenakis, Achilles .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2011, 47 (04) :461-524
[36]   Enterprise Architecture: Informed Steering of Enterprises in Motion [J].
Proper, Henderik A. .
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ICEIS 2013, 2014, 190 :16-34
[37]  
Pulkkinen M., 2008, ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT, P134
[38]  
Ross J.W., 2006, Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution
[39]  
Schekkerman J., 2005, Trends in Enterprise Architecture 2005: How are Organizations Progressing
[40]  
Seppanen V., 2014, From Problems to Critical Success Factors of Enterprise Architecture Adoption