Sperm competition effects on sperm production and expenditure in sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna

被引:21
作者
Aspbury, Andrea S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas State Univ, Dept Biol, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cryptic male choice; livebearing fish; operational sex ratio; strategic allocation;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/arm044
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Sperm competition risk (SCR) models predict that if there is a low probability a male's ejaculate will compete with another male, individuals should invest less sperm in a mating, whereas if the probability of competition is high, males should invest more sperm. Alternatively, models of sperm competition intensity (SCI) predict that increased intensity of sperm competition leads to maximal sperm investment when a male faces a single competitor. Few studies have examined predictions of these models for males of varying size, and none have examined effects of sperm competition on both sperm production and expenditure. To examine effects of sperm competition on these variables, male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) from 3 size classes were randomly assigned to one of 3 treatments that manipulated SCR and SCI: 1) no risk, low intensity; 2) risk present, medium intensity; and 3) risk present, high intensity. Male sailfin mollies produced more sperm in the high-intensity treatment than in the low-intensity treatment. Sailfin mollies in the risk present treatments expended more sperm than those males in the risk absent treatment. There was no significant difference in sperm expenditure between the medium intensity and the high-intensity treatment, indicating that maximal sperm investment does not occur when the number of competing males is one. Furthermore, small males expended more sperm than medium and large males. These results suggest that male sailfin mollies respond as predicted to SCR, but not to SCI. I suggest that male size effects and sperm production should be considered in theoretical treatments of optimal male sperm investment strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:776 / 780
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SPERM COMPETITION IT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, SPERM COMPETITION EV
[3]   Differential sperm priming by male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna):: Effects of female and male size [J].
Aspbury, AS ;
Gabor, CR .
ETHOLOGY, 2004, 110 (03) :193-202
[4]  
Birkhead T. R., 1998, SPERM COMPETITION SE
[5]   Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl [J].
Birkhead, TR ;
Martínez, JG ;
Burke, T ;
Froman, DP .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 266 (1430) :1759-1764
[6]   The effect of female presence on spermiation, and of male sexual activity on 'ready' sperm in the male guppy [J].
Bozynski, CC ;
Liley, NR .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 65 :53-58
[7]   Adjustments of ejaculation rates in response to risk of sperm competition in a fish, the bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus) [J].
Candolin, U ;
Reynolds, JD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 269 (1500) :1549-1553
[8]   Male meadow voles respond differently to risk and intensity of sperm competition [J].
delBarco-Trillo, Javier ;
Ferkin, Michael H. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 17 (04) :581-585
[9]   Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory [J].
Engqvist, L ;
Reinhold, K .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2005, 18 (01) :116-123
[10]   Male mating behavior and ejaculate expenditure under sperm competition risk in the eastern mosquitofish [J].
Evans, JP ;
Pierotti, M ;
Pilastro, A .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2003, 14 (02) :268-273