Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women

被引:25
作者
Bernitz, Stine [1 ]
Oian, Pal [2 ,3 ]
Sandvik, Leiv [4 ,5 ]
Blix, Ellen [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sarpsborg, Norway
[2] Univ Hosp North Norway, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tromso, Norway
[3] Univ Tromso, Dept Clin Med, Fac Hlth Sci, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
[4] Oslo Univ Hosp, Unit Biostat & Epidemiol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Fac Dent, Oslo, Norway
[6] Oslo & Akershus Univ Coll Appl Sci, Fac Hlth, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Low-risk birth; Intrapartum care; Satisfaction; Birth care unit; BIRTH CENTER CARE; POSTPARTUM CARE; DELIVERY; LABOR; INTRAPARTUM; CHILDBIRTH; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-016-0932-x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Satisfaction with birth care is part of quality assessment of care. The aim of this study was to investigate possible differences in satisfaction with intrapartum care among low-risk women, randomized to a midwifery unit or to an obstetric unit within the same hospital. Methods: Randomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Norway. A total of 485 women with no expressed preference for level of birth care, assessed to be at low-risk at onset of spontaneous labor were included. To assess the overall satisfaction with intrapartum care, the Labour and Delivery Satisfaction Index (LADSI) questionnaire, was sent to the participants 6 months after birth. To assess women's experience with intrapartum transfer, four additional items were added. In addition, we tested the effects of the following aspects on satisfaction; obstetrician involved, intrapartum transfer from the midwifery unit to the obstetric unit during labor, mode of delivery and epidural analgesia. Results: Women randomized to the midwifery unit were significantly more satisfied with intrapartum care than those randomized to the obstetric unit (183 versus 176 of maximum 204 scoring points, mean difference 7.2, p = 0.002). No difference was found between the units for women who had an obstetrician involved during labor or delivery and who answered four additional questions on this aspect (mean item score 4.0 at the midwifery unit vs 4.3 at the obstetric unit, p = 0.3). Intrapartum transfer from the midwifery unit to an obstetric unit, operative delivery and epidurals influenced the level of overall satisfaction in a negative direction regardless of allocated unit (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Low-risk women with no expressed preference for level of birth care were more satisfied if allocated to the midwifery unit compared to the obstetric unit.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of clinical care satisfaction in pediatric intensive care unit with permanent presence of parents
    Vizcarra-Alvarado P.
    Garay-Carmona D.G.
    Blanco-Montero A.
    Iglesias-Leboreiro J.
    Bernardez-Zapata I.
    Gordillo-Rodríguez L.
    Vidaña-Pérez D.
    Radwaste Solutions, 2022, 89 (02): : 46 - 51
  • [32] AMBAR: A midwifery-led training program to improve obstetric and neonatal practices among low-risk births in Mexico
    Seris, Marina
    Fritz, Jimena
    Montoya, Alejandra
    Lamadrid-Figueroa, Hector
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2023, 50 (01): : 151 - 160
  • [33] Assessment of Maternal Satisfaction with the Quality of Obstetric Care Provided in the Maternity Unit of Mobini Hospital, Sabzevar, Iran
    Hoseini, Bibi Leila
    Saeidi, Masumeh
    Norouzi, Zahra Beheshti
    Kiani, Mohammad Ali
    Rakhshani, Mohammad Hassan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS-MASHHAD, 2019, 7 (05): : 9369 - 9377
  • [34] Obstetric Outcomes in Adolescents Related to Body Mass Index and Compared with Low-Risk Adult Women
    Isgren, Anna Ramo
    Kjolhede, Preben
    Blomberg, Marie
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 26 (05) : 426 - 434
  • [35] Effect of planned place of birth on obstetric interventions and maternal outcomes among low-risk women: a cohort study in the Netherlands
    Bolten, N.
    De Jonge, A.
    Zwagerman, E.
    Zwagerman, P.
    Klomp, T.
    Zwart, J. J.
    Geerts, C. C.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [36] Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women
    Brown, Heather C.
    Paranjothy, Shantini
    Dowswell, Therese
    Thomas, Jane
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (09):
  • [37] Evaluation of a Mobile Telesimulation Unit to Train Rural and Remote Practitioners on High-Acuity Low-Occurrence Procedures: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jewer, Jennifer
    Parsons, Michael H.
    Dunne, Cody
    Smith, Andrew
    Dubrowski, Adam
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (08)
  • [38] An alternative model of maternity care for low-risk birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes utilizing the midwifery-based birth center model
    Wallace, Jacqueline
    Hoehn-Velasco, Lauren
    Tilden, Ellen
    Dowd, Bryan E.
    Calvin, Steve
    Jolles, Diana R.
    Wright, Jennifer
    Stapleton, Susan
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 59 (01)
  • [39] Getting the first birth right: A retrospective study of outcomes for low-risk primiparous women receiving standard care versus midwifery model of care in the same tertiary hospital
    Wong, Nola
    Browne, Jenny
    Ferguson, Sally
    Taylor, Jan
    Davis, Deborah
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2015, 28 (04) : 279 - 284
  • [40] Evaluation of Cervical Elastography for Prediction of Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Low-Risk Women: A Prospective Study
    Du, Liu
    Zhang, Li-He
    Zheng, Qiao
    Xie, Hong-Ning
    Gu, Yu-Jun
    Lin, Mei-Fang
    Wu, Li-Hong
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (04) : 705 - 713