Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses

被引:339
作者
Capano, Giliberto [1 ]
Howlett, Michael [2 ]
Jarvis, Darryl S. L. [3 ]
Ramesh, M. [4 ]
Goyal, Nihit [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Publ Policy, Bologna, Italy
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Canada Res Chair, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Educ Univ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Social Policy Design, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
COVID-19; policy capacity; pandemics; policy tools; policy mixes; policy styles; crisis management; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The objective of this collection of essays is to gain insights into the different national-level state responses to COVID-19 around the world and the conditions that shaped them. The pandemic offers a natural experiment wherein the policy problem governments faced was the same but the responses they made were different, creating opportunities for comparison of both the kinds of policy tools being used and the factors that accounted for their choice. Accordingly, after surveying on-line databases of policy tools used in the pandemic and subjecting these to topic modelling to reveal the characteristics of a 'standard' national pandemic response, we discuss the similarities and differences found in specific responses. This is done with reference to the nature and level of policy capacity of respective governments, highlighting the critical roles played by (in)adequate preparation and lesson-drawing from past experiences with similar outbreaks or crises. Taken together the articles show how the national responses to the COVID-19 pandemic were shaped by the opportunity and capacity each government had to learn from previous pandemics and their capacity to operationalize and build political support for the standard portfolio of policy measures deployed to deal with the crisis. However, they also show how other factors such as the nature of national leadership, the organization of government and civil society, and blindspots towards the vulnerabilities of certain population segments also helped to shape policy responses to the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 308
页数:24
相关论文
共 81 条
[11]  
Boin A., 2017, Handbook of Disaster Research, P23, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_2
[12]   The Transboundary Crisis: Why we are unprepared and the road ahead [J].
Boin, Arjen .
JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 27 (01) :94-99
[13]   Do policy instruments matter? Governments' choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe [J].
Capano, Giliberto ;
Pritoni, Andrea ;
Vicentini, Giulia .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2020, 40 (03) :375-401
[14]   Policy design spaces in reforming governance in higher education: the dynamics in Italy and the Netherlands [J].
Capano, Giliberto .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 75 (04) :675-694
[15]   How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers' choices [J].
Capano, Giliberto ;
Lippi, Andrea .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2017, 50 (02) :269-293
[16]  
CDC, 2019, Information for Clinicians on Investigational Therapeutics for Patients with COVID-19, 2020, P2020
[17]   COVID-19 Government Response Event Dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0) [J].
Cheng, Cindy ;
Barcelo, Joan ;
Hartnett, Allison Spencer ;
Kubinec, Robert ;
Messerschmidt, Luca .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 4 (07) :756-+
[18]  
Chopera D., 2020, CAN AFRICA WITHSTAND
[19]   An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time [J].
Dong, Ensheng ;
Du, Hongru ;
Gardner, Lauren .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 20 (05) :533-534
[20]   Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities [J].
Dunlop, Claire A. .
POLICY STUDIES, 2009, 30 (03) :289-311