Perihepatic metastases from ovarian cancer: Sensitivity and specificity of CT for the detection of metastases with and those without liver parenchymal invasion

被引:37
作者
Akin, Oguz [1 ]
Sala, Evis [1 ]
Moskowitz, Chaya S. [2 ]
Ishill, Nicole [2 ]
Soslow, Robert A. [3 ]
Chi, Dennis S. [4 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2482070371
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine retrospectively the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) for the differentiation of perihepatic metastases with and those without liver parenchymal invasion (LPI) in patients with ovarian cancer by using interpretations of radiologists with different experience levels and staging laparotomy and pathologic examination findings as the reference standards. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA - compliant study; 121 patients with ovarian cancer (age range, 29 - 94 years; mean age, 57.8 years) formed the study group. Two radiologists blinded to patient clinical data (radiologist 1, 6 months of experience; radiologist 2, 2 years 6 months of experience) retrospectively and independently recorded presence of perihepatic metastases, liver regions involved, and presence of LPI by perihepatic metastases visible on CT images. Sensitivities and specificities for detecting the presence of perihepatic metastases and liver regions involved and sensitivities for detecting LPI were calculated. kappa Statistics were used to analyze interradiologist agreement. Results: Pathologic examination results showed 66 perihepatic metastases in 43 (36%) of 121 patients. Sixty (91%) of 66 perihepatic metastases did not show signs of LPI and six (9%) did. Sensitivity and specificity combinations for radiologists 1 and 2 were 56% and 87% and 86% and 99%, respectively, for detecting the presence of perihepatic metastases and 46% and 97% and 82% and 100%, respectively, for determining liver regions involved. Radiologists 1 and 2 had sensitivities of 35% and 80%, respectively, for detecting regions with perihepatic metastases without LPI and sensitivities of 50% and 100%, respectively, for detecting regions with perihepatic metastases with LPI. Conclusion: CT can be used to detect perihepatic metastases in patients with ovarian cancer and allows for distinction between metastases that invade the liver and those that do not. (C) RSNA, 2008.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 517
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] American Cancer Society, 2008, CANC FACTS FIG 2008
  • [2] [Anonymous], INT J GYNECOL OBSTET
  • [3] What do we expect from imaging?
    Barakat, RR
    Hricak, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 40 (03) : 521 - +
  • [4] Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach
    Chi, DS
    Franklin, CC
    Levine, DA
    Akselrod, F
    Sabbatini, P
    Jarnagin, WR
    DeMatteo, R
    Poynor, EA
    Abu-Rustum, NR
    Barakat, RR
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 94 (03) : 650 - 654
  • [5] Peritoneal metastases: Detection with spiral CT in patients with ovarian cancer
    Coakley, FV
    Choi, PH
    Gougoutas, CA
    Pothuri, B
    Venkatraman, E
    Chi, D
    Bergman, A
    Hricak, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (02) : 495 - 499
  • [6] Optimal cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A commentary
    Eisenkop, Scott M.
    Spirtos, Nick M.
    Lin, Wei-Chien Michael
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (01) : 329 - 335
  • [7] Role of CT and MR imaging in predicting optimal cytoreduction of newly diagnosed primary epithelial ovarian cancer
    Qayyum, A
    Coakley, FV
    Westphalen, AC
    Hricak, H
    Okuno, WT
    Powell, B
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 96 (02) : 301 - 306
  • [8] A SIMPLE METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CLUSTERED BINARY DATA
    RAO, JNK
    SCOTT, AJ
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1992, 48 (02) : 577 - 585
  • [9] ROSE PG, 1989, CANCER, V64, P1508, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19891001)64:7<1508::AID-CNCR2820640725>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-V