Academic integrity in online examinations in a graduate nurse practitioner program: Student perceptions and lessons for nurse educators

被引:8
作者
Aplin-Snider, Christina [1 ]
Buterakos, Roxanne [1 ]
Creech, Constance [1 ,3 ]
Schapel, Sharon A. [2 ]
Feige, Brian D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Flint, MI 48503 USA
[2] Mott Community Coll, 1401 E Court St, Flint, MI 48503 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, 303 E Kearsley St, Flint, MI 48502 USA
关键词
Academic integrity; Online examinations; Nurse practitioner education; Honor code; Academic dishonesty; Online programs; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; DISHONESTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105099
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: While nursing is repeatedly voted the most trusted profession, academic dishonesty is nearly as prevalent in nursing as it is in other disciplines and has been increasing for 30 years. The relationship between academic dishonesty in nursing programs and unethical behavior in clinical settings underscores the importance of exploring student perceptions of academic dishonesty. Method: This descriptive study used a survey methodology to examine graduate nursing students' perceptions of academic dishonesty (willingness to report cheating, exam cheating deterrents, and importance of academic integrity). Results: The results showed that students would report cheating, felt current processes were overall sufficient to deter cheating, value academic integrity, and take their studies seriously. Significant findings included this was more representative of students earlier in their programs vs. those nearer to graduation who felt the current program processes may not be as effective. Conclusion: It is vital that graduate nursing faculty hold students accountable and enact processes that deter cheating. Furthermore, based on the survey results, the researchers incorporated one new best practice from the literature: a syllabus statement for online courses.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Exploring the paradox: A cross-sectional study of academic dishonesty among Australian nursing students [J].
Birks, Melanie ;
Smithson, John ;
Antney, Janene ;
Zhao, Lin ;
Burkot, Camilla .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 65 :96-101
[2]   Don't cheat, be happy. Self-control, self-beliefs, and satisfaction with life in academic honesty: A cross-sectional study in Poland [J].
Blachnio, Agata .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 60 (03) :261-266
[3]   Descriptive profile of the academic integrity of Australian occupational therapy students [J].
Brown, Ted ;
Isbel, Stephen ;
Bourke-Taylor, Helen ;
Gustafsson, Louise ;
McKinstry, Carol ;
Logan, Alexandra .
AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2018, 65 (04) :285-294
[4]   Crossing the "line": College students and academic integrity in nursing [J].
Bultas, Margaret W. ;
Schmuke, Ashley D. ;
Davis, Renee L. ;
Palmer, Janice L. .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2017, 56 :57-62
[5]   Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Academic Cheating Research-Cross-Cultural Comparison [J].
Chudzicka-Czupala, Agata ;
Grabowski, Damian ;
Mello, Abby L. ;
Kuntz, Joana ;
Zaharia, Daniela Victoria ;
Hapon, Nadiya ;
Lupina-Wegener, Anna ;
Boru, Deniz .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2016, 26 (08) :638-659
[6]   Academic Dishonesty: Whose Fault is it Anyway? [J].
DiVall, Margarita V. ;
Schlesselman, Lauren S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 80 (03)
[7]   Cheaters Should Never Win: Eliminating the Benefits of Cheating [J].
Fendler R.J. ;
Godbey J.M. .
Journal of Academic Ethics, 2016, 14 (1) :71-85
[8]  
Glasper Alan, 2016, Br J Nurs, V25, P932, DOI 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.16.932
[9]  
Johnstone Megan-Jane, 2016, Aust Nurs Midwifery J, V23, P33
[10]   Reasons for academic dishonesty during examinations among nursing students: Cross-sectional survey [J].
Kiekkas, Panagiotis ;
Michalopoulos, Eleni ;
Stefanopoulos, Nikolaos ;
Samartzi, Kyriaki ;
Krania, Panagiota ;
Giannikopoulou, Martha ;
Igoumenidis, Michael .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2020, 86