Health effects of particulate matter formation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: critical review and recommendation of models for Brazil

被引:6
作者
Giusti, Gabriela [1 ]
Vieira, Jose Geraldo Vidal [1 ]
de Souza Tadano, Yara [2 ]
Silva, Diogo Aparecido Lopes [1 ]
Fantke, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Res Grp Sustainabil Engn, SP-264,Km 110, BR-18052780 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Doutor Washington Subtil St 330, BR-84017220 Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm & Resource Engn, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, Produktionstorvet 424, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Intake fraction; Effect factor; Air pollution; Characterization model; Human health; AIR-POLLUTION; PREMATURE MORTALITY; INTAKE FRACTIONS; DAMAGE; EXPOSURE; INDOOR; TRENDS; PM2.5;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-022-02068-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose The impact of particulate matter (PM) formation on human health in Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) can be characterized through combining intake fractions with effect factors. However, although there are several characterization models used in different LCIA methods, most of them were not developed for the Brazilian context. This study aims to evaluate the existing models used in LCIA for characterizing PM impacts on human health with respect to their applicability for Brazil. Methods We review existing PM characterization models followed by a critical analysis regarding each model's scope, scientific robustness, and applicability for Brazil, by applying the simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART). Results and discussion The results show that the most recent models, with global coverage and availability of characterization factors (CFs) for Brazil, are the most appropriate. In addition, the highest-scoring models are able to connect with a wide range of goals and scopes that can be defined in Life Cycle Assessment case studies. Although the models of van Zelm et al. (2016), Fantke et al. (2017, 2019), and Oberschelp et al. (2020) are recommended for Brazil, important limitations have been observed. The van Zelm et al. (2016) model provides only country-level CFs and is not further regionalized. The Fantke et al. (2017, 2019) model does not currently provide CFs for PM precursors and is for urban factors limited to cities with more than 100,000 inhabitants. The Oberschelp et al. (2020) model does not currently provide data for indoor environments and uses background concentration data mainly applicable to the Northern Hemisphere. Conclusion Several models for evaluating PM impacts in LCIA are already available. Considering the identified limitations within these models, future work should aim to address these limitations and derive improved and more representative CFs for Brazil.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 884
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Acute effects of fine particulate matter constituents on mortality: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis [J].
Achilleos, Souzana ;
Kioumourtzoglou, Marianthi-Anna ;
Wu, Chih-Da ;
Schwartz, Joel D. ;
Koutrakis, Petros ;
Papatheodorou, Stefania I. .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 109 :89-100
[2]   Water scarcity in Brazil: part 1-regionalization of the AWARE model characterization factors [J].
Andrade, Edilene Pereira ;
de Araujo Nunes, Ana Barbara ;
de Freitas Alves, Kilvia ;
Ugaya, Cassia Maria Lie ;
da Costa Alencar, Mateus ;
de Lima Santos, Tayane ;
da Silva Barros, Viviane ;
Pastor, Amandine Valerie ;
de Figueiredo, Maria Clea Brito .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (12) :2342-2358
[3]   Particulate matter-attributable mortality and relationships with carbon dioxide in 250 urban areas worldwide [J].
Anenberg, Susan C. ;
Achakulwisut, Pattanun ;
Brauer, Michael ;
Moran, Daniel ;
Apte, Joshua S. ;
Henze, Daven K. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Particulate Matter (PM) Pollution
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, AMBIENT AIR POLLUTIO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M, DOI DOI 10.1002/JTR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Human Development Index
[8]   TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 [J].
Bare, Jane .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2011, 13 (05) :687-696
[9]   Air pollution epidemiology: A simplified Generalized Linear Model approach optimized by bio-inspired metaheuristics [J].
Belotti, Jonatas T. ;
Castanho, Diego S. ;
Araujo, Lilian N. ;
da Silva, Lucas, V ;
Alves, Thiago Antonini ;
Tadano, Yara S. ;
Stevan Jr, Sergio L. ;
Correa, Fernanda C. ;
Siqueira, Hugo, V .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 191
[10]   Sensitivity analysis of the use of Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods: a case study on building materials [J].
Bueno, Cristiane ;
Hauschild, Michael Zwicky ;
Rossignolo, Joao Adriano ;
Ometto, Aldo Roberto ;
Mendes, Natalia Crespo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 :2208-2220