How to Teach Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: A Systematic Review

被引:21
作者
Spensberger, Florian [1 ]
Kollar, Ingo [2 ]
Gambrill, Eileen [3 ]
Ghanem, Christian [4 ]
Pankofer, Sabine [4 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Psychol, Leopoldstr 44, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Augsburg, Fac Philosophy & Social Sci, Augsburg, Germany
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Social Welf, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Katholische Stiftungshsch Munchen, Dept Social Work, Munich, Germany
关键词
evidence-based practice; empirically supported treatments; education; social work; systematic review; STUDENTS; HEALTH; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; OUTCOMES; CONSTRUCTIVIST; METAANALYSIS; INSTRUCTION; RELIABILITY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1177/1049731519852150
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Purpose: This article presents a systematic review of research regarding how best to educate social work students and practitioners concerning of the process of evidence-based practice and/or the application of empirically supported treatments (ESTs). Method: We conducted a systematic review with a narrative synthesis, largely following the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews for Interventions and PRISMA reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Results: Twenty-seven studies met our eligibility criteria. These consisted mostly of uncontrolled designs and their measures relied mainly on learners' self-perception regarding acquisition of declarative and procedural knowledge, motivation, and satisfaction. Reports were mostly positive (88.7%). Conclusions: Research regarding the education of social work students and practitioners about the process of evidence-based practice as well as ESTs is limited. Further investigation is needed concerning the effectiveness of specific teaching methods using controlled designs and more rigorous outcome measures including observation of practice in real-life situations and/or in role-plays.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 39
页数:21
相关论文
共 98 条
[21]   Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis [J].
Dochy, F ;
Segers, M ;
Van den Bossche, P ;
Gijbels, D .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2003, 13 (05) :533-568
[22]   Does evidence-based practice improve patient outcomes? An analysis of a natural experiment in a Spanish hospital [J].
Emparanza, Jose I. ;
Cabello, Juan B. ;
Burls, Amanda J. E. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (06) :1059-1065
[23]   Onboarding in Open Source Software Projects: A Preliminary Analysis [J].
Fagerholm, Fabian ;
Johnson, Patrik ;
Guinea, Alejandro Sanchez ;
Borenstein, Jay ;
Muench, Juergen .
2013 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS (ICGSEW 2013), 2013, :5-10
[24]  
Fischer Frank., 2018, International Handbook of the Learning Sciences
[25]   Evidence-based practice and policy: Choices ahead [J].
Gambrill, E .
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2006, 16 (03) :338-357
[26]   Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice [J].
Gambrill, E .
FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HUMAN SERVICES, 1999, 80 (04) :341-350
[27]  
Gambrill E., 2019, Critical thinking and the process of evidence-based practice
[28]  
Gambrill E. D., 2017, Critical thinking for helping professionals: A skills-based workbook
[29]  
Gambrill E.D., 2013, Social Work Practice: A Critical Thinker's Guide
[30]   Evidence-based practice: Counterarguments to objections [J].
Gibbs, L ;
Gambrill, E .
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2002, 12 (03) :452-476