Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for early-stage palpable and nonpalpable invasive breast cancer: decreased excision volume at unchanged tumor-free resection margin

被引:12
作者
Slijkhuis, W. A. [1 ]
Noorda, E. M. [2 ]
van der Zaag-Loonen, H. [3 ]
Bolster-van Eenennaam, M. J. [4 ]
Droogh-de Greve, K. E. [1 ]
Lastdrager, W. B. [4 ]
Gratama, J. W. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gelre Hosp Apeldoorn, Dept Radiol, Oudegracht 3A, NL-3511 AB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Isala Klin, Dept Surg, Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Gelre Hosp Apeldoorn, Dept Epidemiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Gelre Hosp Apeldoorn, Dept Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Ultrasound; INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND; SURGICAL MARGINS; LOBULAR CARCINOMA; RE-EXCISION; LOCALIZATION; LUMPECTOMY; GUIDANCE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-016-3914-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ultrasound guidance (USG) during breast-conserving surgery improves tumor-free surgical resection margins. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether USG reduces resection volumes without compromising margin status. 134 patients with palpable or nonpalpable T1-2N0-1 invasive breast cancer were treated with USG and compared with a historical reference control group (CON) consisting of palpation-guided (PAG) or wire-guided localization (WIG) breast-conserving surgery. Primary outcomes were excess resection volume and clear margin status, and secondary outcome was re-excision rate. 66 patients underwent USG. In the CON group (n = 68), PAG was performed in 24 (35 %) and WIG in 44 (64 %) patients. Median excision volume [39 (IQR 20-66) vs 56 (38-94) cm(3); p = 0.001] and median calculated resection ratio [1.7 (1.0-2.9) vs 2.8 (1.4-4.6) (p = 0.005)] were significantly smaller in the USG than in the CON group. Median minimal distance to the resection margin [4 mm (IQR 2-5 mm) vs 2 mm (1-4 mm), p = 0.004] was significantly larger. Clear resection margins were achieved in 58 of the USG patients (88 %) and in 58 of the CON patients (86 %) (p = 0.91); this was true in patients with palpable as well as nonpalpable lesions. Reexcision was needed in 6.1 and 7.2 % respectively. Relative risk for re-excision in the USG group was 0.82 (95 % CI 0.23-2.93). In patients with palpable and nonpalpable breast cancers, USG allows for lower excision volume and reduced resection of healthy breast tissue, without increased re-excision rate.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 541
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Intra-operative ultrasound versus wire-guided localization in the surgical management of non-palpable breast cancers: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmed, M.
    Douek, M.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 140 (03) : 435 - 446
  • [2] The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation
    Al-Ghazal, SK
    Blamey, RW
    Stewart, J
    Morgan, DAL
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (06): : 566 - 570
  • [3] Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for excision of non-palpable invasive breast cancer: a hospital-based series and an overview of the literature
    Barentsz, M. W.
    van Dalen, T.
    Gobardhan, P. D.
    Bongers, V.
    Perre, C. I.
    Pijnappel, R. M.
    van den Bosch, M. A. A. J.
    Verkooijen, H. M.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 135 (01) : 209 - 219
  • [4] Intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of nonpalpable breast lesions
    Bennett, IC
    Greenslade, J
    Chiam, H
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 29 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [5] Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma
    Butler, RS
    Venta, LA
    Wiley, EL
    Ellis, RL
    Dempsey, PJ
    Rubin, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (02) : 325 - 330
  • [6] Assessing Cosmetic Results After Breast Conserving Surgery
    Cardoso, Maria Joao
    Oliveira, Helder
    Cardoso, Jaime
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [7] Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised
    Cochrane, RA
    Valasiadou, P
    Wilson, ARM
    Al-Ghazal, SK
    Macmillan, RD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (12) : 1505 - 1509
  • [8] Davis KM, 2011, AM SURGEON, V77, P720
  • [9] Eggemann H, 2016, CLIN BREAST CANCER, V16, P1
  • [10] Ultrasonography-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery Is Superior to Palpation-Guided Surgery for Palpable Breast Cancer
    Eggemann, Holm
    Ignatov, Tanja
    Beni, Alexander
    Costa, Serban Dan
    Ignatov, Atanas
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2014, 14 (01) : 40 - 45