Prognostic role of EEG identical bursts in patients after cardiac arrest: Multimodal correlation

被引:12
|
作者
Barbella, Giuseppina [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Novy, Jan [4 ,5 ]
Marques-Vidal, Pedro [5 ,6 ]
Oddo, Mauro [5 ,7 ]
Rossetti, Andrea O. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] San Gerardo Hosp, Neurol Unit, Monza, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Sch Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Milan Ctr Neurosci NeuroMI, Milan, Italy
[4] Lausanne Univ Hosp CHUV, Dept Neurol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[6] Lausanne Univ Hosp CHUV, Dept Med, Internal Med, Lausanne, Switzerland
[7] Lausanne Univ Hosp CHUV, Dept Adult Intens Care, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Postanoxic; Coma; EEG; Burst-suppression; Outcome; EUROPEAN RESUSCITATION COUNCIL; PREDICTION; PATTERNS; SOCIETY; COMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aims: EEG burst-suppression (BS) heralds poor outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). Within this pattern, identical bursts (IB) have been suggested to be absolutely specific, in isolation. We assessed IB prevalence and their added predictive value for poor outcome in a multimodal prognostic approach. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a registry of comatose adults with CA (April 2011-February 2019), undergoing EEG at 5-36 h and 36-72 h. SB and IB were visually assessed. Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) at 3 months were dichotomized as "good" (CPC 1-2), or "poor" (CPC 3-5). Sensitivity, specificity, positive, negative predictive values of BS and IB for poor outcome were calculated. A multimodal prognostic score was created assigning one point each to unreactive and epileptiform EEG, pupillary light reflex and SSEPs absence, NSE > 751 mu g/l. In a second score, IB were added; predictive performances were compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Of 522 patients, 147 (28%) had BS in any EEG (10 [7%] had good outcome and 129 [88%] died). Of them, 53/147 (36%, 10% of total) showed IB, 47/53 (89%) of which within 36 h. IB were 100% specific for poor outcome, and associated with higher serum NSE than BS. However, there was no significant difference between the scores with and without IB for CPC 3-5 (p = 0.116). Conclusion: IB occur in 10% of patients after CA. In our multimodal context, IB, albeit being very specific for poor outcome, seem redundant with other predictors.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 144
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Standardized EEG interpretation in patients after cardiac arrest: Correlation with other prognostic predictors
    Beuchat, Isabelle
    Solari, Daria
    Novy, Jan
    Oddo, Mauro
    Rossetti, Andrea O.
    RESUSCITATION, 2018, 126 : 143 - 146
  • [2] Multimodal assessment of favorable neurological outcome using NSE levels and kinetics, EEG and SSEP in comatose patients after cardiac arrest
    Besnard, Aurelie
    Pelle, Juliette
    Pruvost-Robieux, Estelle
    Ginguay, Antonin
    Vigneron, Clara
    Pene, Frederic
    Mira, Jean-Paul
    Cariou, Alain
    Benghanem, Sarah
    CRITICAL CARE, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [3] Prognostic Value of EEG in Patients after Cardiac Arrest-An Updated Review
    Muhlhofer, Wolfgang
    Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
    CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2018, 18 (04)
  • [4] Retrospective Visual and Quantitative Assessment of Burst Suppression With and Without Identical Bursts in Patients After Cardiac Arrest
    Fong, Michael W. K.
    Pu, Kelly
    Beekman, Rachel
    Kim, Noah
    Nguyen, Christine
    Gilmore, Emily J.
    Hirsch, Lawrence J.
    Zaveri, Hitten P.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2025,
  • [5] Prognostic Value of EEG in Patients after Cardiac Arrest—An Updated Review
    Wolfgang Muhlhofer
    Jerzy P. Szaflarski
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2018, 18
  • [6] EEG for good outcome prediction after cardiac arrest: A multicentre cohort study
    Turella, S.
    Dankiewicz, J.
    Ben-Hamouda, N.
    Nilsen, Kb
    During, J.
    Endisch, C.
    Engstrom, M.
    Flugel, D.
    Gaspard, N.
    Grejs, A. M.
    Haenggi, M.
    Haffey, S.
    Imbach, L.
    Johnsen, B.
    Kemlink, D.
    Leithner, C.
    Legriel, S.
    Lindehammar, H.
    Mazzon, G.
    Nielsen, N.
    Peyre, A.
    Stanford, B. Ribalta
    Roman-Pognuz, E.
    Rossetti, A. O.
    Schrag, C.
    Valerianova, A.
    Wendel-Garcia, P.
    Zubler, F.
    Cronberg, T.
    Westhall, E.
    RESUSCITATION, 2024, 202
  • [7] The Prognostic Value of Simplified EEG in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients
    Eertmans, Ward
    Genbrugge, Cornelia
    Haesen, Jolien
    Drieskens, Carolien
    Demeestere, Jelle
    Vander Laenen, Margot
    Boer, Willem
    Mesotten, Dieter
    Dens, Jo
    Ernon, Ludovic
    Jans, Frank
    De Deyne, Cathy
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2019, 30 (01) : 139 - 148
  • [8] Association between somatosensory evoked potentials and EEG in comatose patients after cardiac arrest
    Glimmerveen, Astrid B.
    Ruijter, Barry J.
    Keijzer, Hanneke M.
    Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C.
    van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
    Hofmeijer, Jeannette
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 130 (11) : 2026 - 2031
  • [9] EEG registration after cardiac arrest: On the way to plug and play?
    Horn, Janneke
    van Merkerk, Myrthe
    RESUSCITATION, 2021, 165 : 182 - 183
  • [10] Assessment of a standardized EEG reactivity protocol after cardiac arrest
    Caroyer, Sarah
    Depondt, Chantal
    Rikir, Estelle
    Mavroudakis, Nicolas
    Peluso, Lorenzo
    Taccone, Fabio Silvio
    Legros, Benjamin
    Gaspard, Nicolas
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 132 (07) : 1687 - 1693