Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection

被引:0
作者
Doeksen, A.
Tanis, P. J.
Vrouenraets, B. C.
van Lanschot, J. J. B.
van Tets, W. F.
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Sint Lucas Andreas Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-1006 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
colorectal surgery; anastomosis; leakage; clinical parameter; delay; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; LARGE-BOWEL RESECTION; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; RECTAL-CANCER; RISK-FACTORS; SURGERY; SMOKING; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To analyze the time interval ('delay') between the first occurrence of clinical parameters associated with anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection and subsequent relaparotomy. METHODS: In 36 out of 289 consecutive patients with colorectal anastomosis, leakage was confirmed at relaparotomy. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively analysed and type and time of appearance of clinical parameters suggestive of anastomotic leakage were recorded. These parameters included heart rate, body temperature, local or generalized peritoneal reaction, leucocytosis, ileus and delayed gastric emptying. Factors influencing delay of relaparotomy and consequences of delayed recognition and treatment were determined. RESULTS: First documentation of at least one of the predefined parameters for anastomotic leakage was after a median interval of 4 +/- 1.7 d after the operation. The median number of days between first parameter(s) associated with leakage and relaparotomy was 3.5 +/- 5.7 d. The time interval between the first signs of leakage and relaparotomy was significantly longer when a weekend was included (4.2 d vs 2.4 d, P = 0.021) or radiological evaluation proved to be false-negative (8.1 d vs 3.5 d, P = 0.007). No significant association between delay and number of additional relaparotomies, hospital stay or mortality could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION: An intervening weekend and negative diagnostic imaging reports may contribute to a delay in diagnosis and relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage. That delay was more than two days in two-thirds of the patients. (c) 2007 WJG. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3721 / 3725
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   EARLY POSTOPERATIVE CONTRAST RADIOLOGY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF COLORECTAL ANASTOMOTIC INTEGRITY [J].
AKYOL, AM ;
MCGREGOR, JR ;
GALLOWAY, DJ ;
GEORGE, WD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1992, 7 (03) :141-143
[2]   Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: Multivariate analysis of 707 patients [J].
Alves, A ;
Panis, Y ;
Trancart, D ;
Regimbeau, JM ;
Pocard, M ;
Valleur, P .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 26 (04) :499-502
[3]   Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection [J].
Alves, A ;
Panis, Y ;
Pocard, M ;
Regimbeau, JM ;
Valleur, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 189 (06) :554-559
[4]   Impact of obesity on surgical outcomes after colorectal resection [J].
Benoist, S ;
Panis, Y ;
Alves, A ;
Valleur, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (04) :275-281
[5]  
DEBAS HT, 1972, SURG GYNECOL OBSTETR, V135, P747
[6]   ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS AFTER LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR RECTAL-CARCINOMA - EVALUATION WITH CT AND BARIUM ENEMA [J].
DUBROW, RA ;
DAVID, CL ;
CURLEY, SA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (03) :567-571
[7]   Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach [J].
Eckmann, C ;
Kujath, P ;
Schiedeck, THK ;
Shekarriz, H ;
Bruch, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2004, 19 (02) :128-133
[8]  
Efron EJ VA., 2003, Reoperative Colon and Rectal Surgery, P1
[9]   Smoking, hypertension, and colonic anastomotic healing; A combined clinical and histopathological study [J].
Fawcett, A ;
Shembekar, M ;
Church, JS ;
Vashisht, R ;
Springall, RG ;
Nott, DM .
GUT, 1996, 38 (05) :714-718
[10]  
Golub R, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V184, P364