Comparison of Two Methods of Long Bone Fracture Repair in Rabbits

被引:14
作者
Barron, Heather W.
McBride, Michael
Martinez-Jimenez, David
Foutz, Timothy
Divers, Stephen
Budsberg, Steven
机构
[1] Roger Williams Pk Zoo, Providence, RI USA
[2] Loving Hands Anim Clin, Alpharetta, GA USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Coll Agr & Environm Sci, Athens, GA USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Dept Small Anim Med & Surg, Coll Vet Med, Athens, GA USA
关键词
bone; ESF device; femur; fracture; plate; rabbit; EXTERNAL SKELETAL FIXATION; PLATE FIXATION; CONFIGURATIONS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1053/j.jepm.2010.06.004
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Two different methods of rabbit femoral fracture repair were evaluated: (1) stainless-steel surgical plate and bone screws; and (2) placement of an intramedullary pin and an external skeletal fixator device. On average, bones repaired with the bone plate method withstood 35.1 lb/47.6 N (range, 14.4-63.0 lb/19.5-85.4 N) of compressive and bending forces before failure occurred. Bones repaired with intramedullary pin and external skeletal fixator device method withstood an average of 67.7 lb/91.8 N (range, 48.7-94.8 lb/66.0-128.5 N) of compressive and bending forces before failure, but the bone was more likely to shatter during implant application. Normal rabbit femurs placed in the control group were able to withstand an average of 148.4 lb/201.2 N (range, 100.0-192.0 lb/135.6-260.3 N). The fragility of rabbit bones made testing of any implant viability problematic. This study demonstrates advantages and disadvantages to each method of fixation in rabbits and compares important differences in application of fracture repair implants with those of other domestic species. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 188
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Aron DN., 1991, Vet Comp Orth Traumatol, V3, P86
[2]  
Brewer N. R., 1994, The biology of the laboratory rabbit., P63
[3]  
BRINKER WO, 1985, J AM ANIM HOSP ASSOC, V21, P801
[4]  
Cruise L. J., 1994, The biology of the laboratory rabbit., P47
[5]  
Donnelly T., 1997, Ferrets, rabbits, and rodents-clinical medicine and surgery, P147
[6]   STATIC STRENGTH EVALUATION OF 6 EXTERNAL SKELETAL FIXATION CONFIGURATIONS [J].
EGGER, EL .
VETERINARY SURGERY, 1983, 12 (03) :130-136
[7]   EFFECT OF FREEZING ON HISTOLOGIC AND BIOMECHANICAL FAILURE PATTERNS IN THE RABBIT CAPITAL FEMORAL GROWTH PLATE [J].
LEE, KE ;
PELKER, RR .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1985, 3 (04) :514-515
[8]   MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF HALF-PIN (TYPE-1) EXTERNAL SKELETAL FIXATION IN COMBINATION WITH A SINGLE INTRAMEDULLARY PIN [J].
MCPHERRON, MA ;
SCHWARZ, PD ;
HISTAND, MB .
VETERINARY SURGERY, 1992, 21 (03) :178-182
[9]   PLATE FIXATION OF TIBIAL FRACTURES IN THE RABBIT - CORRELATION OF BONE STRENGTH WITH DURATION OF FIXATION [J].
TERJESEN, T .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1984, 55 (04) :452-456
[10]   BONE HEALING AFTER METAL PLATE FIXATION AND EXTERNAL FIXATION OF THE OSTEOTOMIZED RABBIT TIBIA [J].
TERJESEN, T .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1984, 55 (01) :69-77