Administrative Law Without Courts

被引:0
作者
Walker, Christopher J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Michael E Moritz Coll Law, Law, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
CHEVRON;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
As part of the UCLA Law Review's Symposium on The Safeguards of Our Constitutional Republic, this Article argues that it is a mistake to fixate on courts as the core safeguard in the modern administrative state. So much of administrative law happens without courts. Put differently, federal agencies regulate us in many meaningful, and sometimes frightening, ways that either evade judicial review entirely or are at least substantially insulated from such review. This Article surveys the phenomenon. It sketches out seven categories of such agency action, drawing on examples from both the Obama and Trump Administrations and highlighting some of the relevant scholarship. The Article concludes with a few observations concerning the implications of administrative law without courts for administrative law theory and doctrine and a call for more scholarly attention.
引用
收藏
页码:1620 / 1640
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   SYMMETRY'S MANDATE: CONSTRAINING THE POLITICIZATION OF AMERICAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW [J].
Walters, Daniel E. .
MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 2020, 119 (03) :455-518
[23]   STAYING AGENCY RULES: CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND RULE OF LAW IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE [J].
Cass, Ronald A. .
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2017, 69 (02) :225-258
[24]   INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, JUDICIAL DEFERENCE, AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW NORMS IN CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION MAKING [J].
Berger, Eric .
BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2011, 91 (06) :2029-2102
[25]   The FSOC's Designation Program as a Case Study of the New Administrative Law of Financial Supervision [J].
Weber, Robert F. .
YALE JOURNAL ON REGULATION, 2019, 36 (01) :359-446
[26]   AVOIDING NORMATIVE CANONS IN THE REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATIONS OF LAW: A BRAND X DOCTRINE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AVOIDANCE [J].
Walker, Christopher J. .
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2012, 64 (01) :139-190
[27]   Administrative Change [J].
Kozel, Randy J. ;
Pojanowski, Jeffrey A. .
UCLA LAW REVIEW, 2011, 59 (01) :112-169
[28]   Administrative Constitutionalism [J].
Metzger, Gillian E. .
TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 2013, 91 (07) :1897-1935
[29]   Minor Courts, Major Questions [J].
Coenen, Michael ;
Davis, Seth .
VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 2017, 70 (03) :777-843
[30]   Administrative Regulation of Arbitration [J].
Godi, Matteo .
YALE JOURNAL ON REGULATION, 2019, 36 (02) :853-879