Event-related potential evidence for multiple causes of the revelation effect

被引:14
作者
Leynes, PA
Landau, J
Walker, J
Addante, RJ
机构
[1] Coll New Jersey, Dept Psychol, Ewing, NJ 08628 USA
[2] York Coll Penn, Dept Psychol, York, PA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
event-related potentials; revelation effect; recognition;
D O I
10.1016/j.concog.2004.08.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Asking people to discover the identity of a recognition test probe immediately before making a recognition judgment increases the probability of an old judgment. To inform theories of this "revelation effect," event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded for revealed and intact test items across two experiments. In Experiment 1, we used a revelation effect paradigm where half of the test probes were presented as anagrams (i.e., a related task) and the other items were presented intact. The pattern of ERP results from this experiment suggested that revealing an item decreases initial familiarity levels and caused the revealed items to elicit similar levels of activity. In Experiment 2, half of the probes were preceded by an addition task (i.e., an unrelated task). The pattern of ERP effects in this study were distinct from those observed in Experiment 1. More specifically, revealed item ERPs were more negative than intact ERPs at frontal electrodes and more positive at parietal electrodes early in the interval. Later in the epoch, revealed item ERPs were more negative than intact items. These data suggest that related tasks decrease familiarity and alter the signal-to-noise ratio of old and new items, whereas unrelated tasks affect processing in a different way (perhaps by changing decision processes) that also results in the revelation effect. The implications for current theories of the revelation effect are discussed. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 350
页数:24
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
AZIMIANFARIDANI N, IN PRESS PSYCHONOMIC
[2]   LEVELS OF PROCESSING - FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
LOCKHART, RS .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :671-684
[3]   Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity [J].
Curran, T .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (06) :923-938
[4]   The electrophysiology of incidental and intentional retrieval: ERP old new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory [J].
Curran, T .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1999, 37 (07) :771-785
[5]   ERP recordings during a picture fragment completion task: effects of memory instructions [J].
Cycowicz, YM ;
Friedman, D .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (03) :271-288
[6]   ON THE PREDICTION OF OCCURRENCE OF PARTICULAR VERBAL INTRUSIONS IN IMMEDIATE RECALL [J].
DEESE, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1959, 58 (01) :17-22
[7]   ERP 'old/new' effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s) [J].
Finnigan, S ;
Humphreys, MS ;
Dennis, S ;
Geffen, G .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2002, 40 (13) :2288-2304
[8]  
GREEN DM, 1966, SIGNAL DETECTION THE
[9]   A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory [J].
Hicks, JL ;
Marsh, RL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1998, 24 (05) :1105-1120
[10]   Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect [J].
Hockley, WE ;
Niewiadomski, MW .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (08) :1176-1184