Complex rupture dynamics on an immature fault during the 2020 Mw 6.8 Elazig earthquake, Turkey

被引:49
作者
Gallovic, Frantisek [1 ]
Zahradnik, Jiri [1 ]
Plicka, Vladimir [1 ]
Sokos, Efthimios [2 ]
Evangelidis, Christos [3 ]
Fountoulakis, Ioannis [3 ]
Turhan, Fatih [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Geophys, Fac Math & Phys, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Patras, Dept Geol, Seismol Lab, Patras, Greece
[3] Natl Observ Athens, Inst Geodynam, Athens, Greece
[4] Bogazici Univ, Kandilli Observ, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Bogazici Univ, Earthquake Res Inst, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT | 2020年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
SHALLOW SLIP DEFICIT; EASTERN TURKEY; LAKE HAZAR; POSTSEISMIC DEFORMATION; 7.1; VAN; SIMULATIONS; GREECE; SEGMENTATION; ALGORITHM; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1038/s43247-020-00038-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Physical laws governing friction on shallow faults in the Earth and spatial heterogeneity of parameters are critical to our understanding of earthquake physics and the assessment of earthquake hazards. Here we use a laboratory-derived fault-friction law and high-quality strong-motion seismic recordings of the 2020 Elazig earthquake, Turkey, to reveal the complex rupture dynamics. We discover an initial Mw 5.8 rupture stage and explain how cascading behavior of the event, involving at least three episodes, each of M > 6, caused it to evolve into a large earthquake, contrarily to other M5+ events on this part of the East Anatolian Fault. Although the dynamic stress transfer during the rupture did not overcome the strength of the uppermost similar to 5 kilometers, surface ruptures during future earthquakes cannot be ruled out. We foresee that future, routine dynamic inversions will improve understanding of earthquake rupture parameters, an essential component of modern, physics-based earthquake hazard assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Seismotectonics of Malatya Fault, Eastern Turkey
    Acarel, Digdem
    Cambaz, Musavver Didem
    Turhan, Fatih
    Mutlu, Ahu Komec
    Polat, Remzi
    [J]. OPEN GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 11 (01): : 1098 - 1111
  • [2] Ambraseys NN, 1998, GEOPHYS J INT, V133, P390, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00508.x
  • [3] Under the Hood of the Earthquake Machine: Toward Predictive Modeling of the Seismic Cycle
    Barbot, Sylvain
    Lapusta, Nadia
    Avouac, Jean-Philippe
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 336 (6082) : 707 - 710
  • [4] Barka A A., 1997, Annali Di Geophis, VXI, P587, DOI DOI 10.HTTPS://D0I.0RG/10.4401/AG-3892
  • [5] STRIKE-SLIP-FAULT GEOMETRY IN TURKEY AND ITS INFLUENCE ON EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY
    BARKA, AA
    KADINSKYCADE, K
    [J]. TECTONICS, 1988, 7 (03) : 663 - 684
  • [6] The 1998 March 14 Fandoqa earthquake (Mw 6.6) in Kerman province, southeast Iran:: re-rupture of the 1981 Sirch earthquake fault, triggering of slip on adjacent thrusts and the active tectonics of the Gowk fault zone
    Berberian, M
    Jackson, JA
    Fielding, E
    Parsons, BE
    Priestley, K
    Qorashi, M
    Talebian, M
    Walker, R
    Wright, TJ
    Baker, C
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 146 (02) : 371 - 398
  • [7] Buried shallow fault slip from the South Napa earthquake revealed by near-field geodesy
    Brooks, Benjamin A.
    Minson, Sarah E.
    Glennie, Craig L.
    Nevitt, Johanna M.
    Dawson, Tim
    Rubin, Ron
    Ericksen, Todd L.
    Lockner, David
    Hudnut, Kenneth
    Langenheim, Victoria
    Lutz, Andrew
    Mareschal, Maxime
    Murray, Jessica
    Schwartz, David
    Zaccone, Dana
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (07):
  • [8] Cetin, 2016, EGU GEN ASSEMBLY GEO, V18
  • [9] Paleoseismology of the Palu-Lake Hazar segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey
    Cetin, H
    Güneyli, H
    Mayer, L
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2003, 374 (3-4) : 163 - 197
  • [10] Dewey JF, 1986, GEOL SOC SPEC PUBL, V19, P3