Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from "how" to "what"

被引:274
作者
Avnet, T
Higgins, ET
机构
关键词
regulation mode; assessment; locomotion; value-from-fit; outcome value; decision making outcome; choice strategies;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00027-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Regulatory fit is experienced when people pursue a goal in a manner that sustains their regulatory orientation. Previous research on promotion and prevention orientations has found that regulatory fit increases people's perception that a decision they made was "right," which in turn transfers value to the decision outcome, including being willing to pay more for a product than those who chose the same product without regulatory fit (Higgins, 2000; Higgins et al., in press). We predicted that the effect of regulatory fit on monetary value could be generalized to locomotion and assessment orientations. Participants were willing to pay over 40% more for the same book-light when it was chosen with a strategy that fit their regulatory orientation (assessmend/"full evaluation"; locomotion/"progressive elimination") than when it was chosen with a non-fit strategy. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 530
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]  
Higgins ET, 2000, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V30, P3
[12]   Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle [J].
Higgins, ET .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :1-46
[13]   Beyond pleasure and pain [J].
Higgins, ET .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (12) :1280-1300
[14]   How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making [J].
Higgins, ET .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :177-191
[15]  
Higgins ET, 2003, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC
[16]  
HIGGINS ET, IN PRESS J PERSONALI
[17]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[18]   To "do the right thing" or to "just do it": Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives [J].
Kruglanski, AW ;
Thompson, EP ;
Higgins, ET ;
Atash, MN ;
Pierro, A ;
Shah, JY ;
Spiegel, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (05) :793-815
[19]  
Kuhl J., 1985, ACTION CONTROL COGNI, P101, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_6
[20]  
Lewin K., 1976, FIELD THEORY SOCIAL