Explicating the privacy paradox: A qualitative inquiry of online shopping consumers

被引:85
作者
Bandara, Ruwan [1 ]
Fernando, Mario [1 ]
Akter, Shahriar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Business, Sch Management Operat & Mkt, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sydney Business Sch, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
关键词
Consumer online privacy; Privacy paradox; Online shopping; PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT; CONSTRUAL-LEVEL; E-COMMERCE; DISTANCE; DISCLOSURE; ATTITUDES; FACEBOOK; TRUST; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101947
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Online consumers often voice discontent and concern over their privacy and yet fail to take adequate precautions. Nor do they abstain from disclosing information. This study aims to explore this phenomenon which is known as the privacy paradox. Based on semi-structured interviews with online shopping consumers and thematic analysis of data, this paper illuminates the privacy paradox using three themes: psychological distance of privacy, perceived social contracts of privacy, and learned helplessness and privacy empowerment. Our findings contribute to the privacy paradox discourse and provide several implications for consumers, online retailers, and policymakers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Privacy and rationality in individual decision making
    Acquisti, A
    Grossklags, J
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2005, 3 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [2] The personalization-privacy paradox: implications for new media
    Aguirre, Elizabeth
    Roggeveen, Anne L.
    Grewal, Dhruv
    Wetzels, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER MARKETING, 2016, 33 (02) : 98 - 110
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, NW J TECHNOLOGY INTE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1985, NATURALISTIC INQUIRY, DOI DOI 10.1002/EV.1427
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, SOCIAL PSYCHOL MORAL, DOI DOI 10.1037/13091-010
  • [6] [Anonymous], P 5 ACM C EL COMM NE
  • [7] [Anonymous], CLIN HEMORHEOL MICRO
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, P 5 ANN WEBSCI13
  • [9] [Anonymous], INT J CONSUM STUD
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2016, Columbia Science and Technology Law Review