Evaluation of alternative landfill cover soils for attenuating hydrogen sulfide from construction and demolition (C&D) debris landfills

被引:45
作者
Plaza, Cristine [1 ]
Xu, Qiyong [1 ]
Townsend, Timothy [1 ]
Bitton, Gabriel [1 ]
Booth, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Environm Engn Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
construction and demolition debris landfills; hydrogen sulfide; cover soil emission rate; landfill gas;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) generated from C&D debris landfills has emerged as a major environmental concern due to odor problems and possible health impacts to landfill employees and surrounding residents. Research was performed to evaluate the performance of various cover materials as control measures for H2S emissions from C&D debris landfills. Twelve laboratory-scale simulated landfill columns containing gypsum drywall were operated under anaerobic conditions to promote H2S production. Five different cover materials were placed on top of the waste inside duplicate columns: (1) sandy soil, (2) sandy soil amended with lime, (3) clayey soil, (4) fine concrete (particle size less than 2.5 cm), and (5) coarse concrete (particle size greater than 2.5 cm). No cover was placed on two of the columns, which were used as controls. H2S concentrations measured from the middle of the waste layer ranged from 50,000 to 150,000 ppm. The different cover materials demonstrated varying H2S removal efficiencies. The sandy soil amended with lime and the fine concrete were the most effective for the control of H2S emissions. Both materials exhibited reduction efficiencies greater than 99%. The clayey and sandy soils exhibited lower reduction efficiencies, with average removal efficiencies of 65% and 30%, respectively. The coarse concrete was found to be the least efficient material as a result of its large particle size. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 322
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, ENVIRON PROG, DOI DOI 10.1002/EP.670030215
[2]  
*ATSDR, 2003, MED MAN GUID MMGS HY
[3]  
BARLAZ MA, 2004, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V38, P4865
[4]   Methane emission from a landfill and the methane oxidising capacity of its covering soil [J].
Boeckx, P ;
vanCleemput, O ;
Villaralvo, I .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 28 (10-11) :1397-1405
[5]  
Bogner J., 1995, LANDFILL METHANE EMI
[6]  
BOGNER JE, 1992, ECOL B, V42, P98
[7]   Ambient hydrogen sulfide, total reduced sulfur, and hospital visits for respiratory diseases in northeast Nebraska, 1998-2000 [J].
Campagna, D ;
Kathman, SJ ;
Pierson, R ;
Inserra, SG ;
Phifer, BL ;
Middleton, DC ;
Zarus, GM ;
White, MC .
JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) :180-187
[8]  
Chou C. H. S. J., 2003, HYDROGEN SULFIDE HUM
[9]   SULFATE REDUCTION IN SOIL - EFFECTS OF REDOX POTENTIAL AND PH [J].
CONNELL, WE ;
PATRICK, WH .
SCIENCE, 1968, 159 (3810) :86-&
[10]  
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 1998, CHAR BUILD REL CONST