An MCDM Approach for Cloud Computing Service Selection Based on Best-Only Method

被引:14
作者
Mostafa, Ahmed M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Helwan Univ, Fac Engn, Comp & Syst Engn Dept, Cairo 11795, Egypt
关键词
Cloud computing; Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; Indexes; Complexity theory; Bills of materials; Licenses; Computer architecture; Cloud computing (CC); cloud service selection; cloud service providers (CSPs); multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM); best only method (BOM); best-worst method (BWM); analytical hierarchical process (AHP); MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3129716
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Owing to the significant and continuous development of cloud computing technology and the increasing number of cloud service providers (CSPs) that have emerged, CSP selection has become a challenging decision for many organizations. To accurately evaluate the services provided by various CSPs, many independent criteria must be considered, resulting in a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In MCDM problems, several alternatives are assessed against several criteria to identify the optimal alternative (s). The challenges stem from complex computation as well as less consistency, resulting in less reliable results. In this paper, a new method, called the best-only method (BOM), is proposed for solving the CSP selection problem, which is viable, efficient, and fully consistent. The proposed method was evaluated and validated using a use-case scenario, demonstrating its efficiency and appropriateness. The proposed method is compared with two popular MCDM methods, analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and best-worst method (BWM), from three perspectives: efficiency, consistency ratio (CR), and total deviation (TD). Based on the obtained results, AHP and BWM require 75.3% and 46.2% more comparisons, respectively, than the proposed method. The consistency ratios for AHP, BWM, and the proposed method were 37.92%, 13.35%, and 0%, respectively. The total deviations are 21.26, 8.65, and 0 for AHP, BWM, and the proposed method, respectively. These results clearly indicate that the proposed method outperforms AHP and BWM in terms of computing complexity and consistency, making it more efficient and reliable.
引用
收藏
页码:155072 / 155086
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cloud service scrutinization and selection framework (C3SF): A novel unified approach to cloud service selection with consensus
    Hussain, Abid
    Chun, Jin
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 586 : 155 - 175
  • [22] Membrane-based models for service selection in cloud
    Raghavan, S.
    Chandrasekaran, K.
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 558 : 103 - 123
  • [23] A FRAMEWORK FOR SELECTION OF BEST CLOUD SERVICE PROVIDER USING RANKED VOTING METHOD
    Baranwal, Gaurav
    Vidyarthi, Deo Prakash
    SOUVENIR OF THE 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ADVANCE COMPUTING CONFERENCE (IACC), 2014, : 831 - 837
  • [24] A Robust and Efficient MCDM-Based Framework for Cloud Service Selection Using Modified TOPSIS
    Tiwari, Rohit Kumar
    Kumar, Rakesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLOUD APPLICATIONS AND COMPUTING, 2021, 11 (01) : 21 - 51
  • [25] An Evolutive Hybrid Approach to Cloud Computing Provider Selection
    de Moraes, Lucas Borges
    Fiorese, Adriano
    Parpinelli, Rafael Stubs
    2018 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2018, : 1564 - 1571
  • [26] Evaluating Cloud Computing Based Telecommunications Service Quality Enhancement by Using a New Hybrid MCDM Model
    Huang, Chi-Yo
    Hsu, Pei-Chu
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES (IDT'2012), VOL 1, 2012, 15 : 519 - 536
  • [27] Prioritizing the solution of cloud service selection using integrated MCDM methods under Fuzzy environment
    Rakesh Ranjan Kumar
    Siba Mishra
    Chiranjeev Kumar
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2017, 73 : 4652 - 4682
  • [28] An Efficient Hybrid Ranking Method for Cloud Computing Services Based on User Requirements
    Ma, Zongbao
    Nejat, Mohammad Hossein
    Vahdat-Nejad, Hamed
    Barzegar, Behnam
    Fatehi, Saeed
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 72988 - 73004
  • [29] RFID service provider selection: An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Karabulut, Yagmur
    Arsenyan, Jbid
    MEASUREMENT, 2017, 112 : 88 - 98
  • [30] An influence diagram based cloud service selection approach in dynamic cloud marketplaces
    Sun, Le
    CLUSTER COMPUTING-THE JOURNAL OF NETWORKS SOFTWARE TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 22 (Suppl 3): : S7369 - S7378