Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer

被引:20
作者
Herrmann, S. D. [1 ]
Hart, T. L. [1 ]
Lee, C. D. [1 ]
Ainsworth, B. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Healthy Lifestyles Res Ctr, Program Exercise & Wellness, Coll Nursing & Hlth Innovat, Mesa, AZ 85212 USA
关键词
ASSESS ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PUBLIC-HEALTH; UNITED-STATES; CALIBRATION; RECOMMENDATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1136/bjsm.2009.062182
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objective To examine the concurrent validity of the Technogym MyWellness Key accelerometer against objective and subjective physical activity (PA) measures. Design Randomised, cross-sectional design with two phases. The laboratory phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph GT1M and the Yamax SW200 Digiwalker pedometer during graded treadmill walking, increasing speed each minute. The free-living phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph, Digiwalker, Bouchard Activity cord (BAR) and Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for seven continuous days. Data were analysed using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients for all comparisons. Setting Laboratory and free-living phases. Participants Sixteen participants randomly stratified from 41 eligible respondents by sex (n=8 men; n=8 women) and PA levels (n=4 low, n=8 middle and n=4 high active). Results There was a strong association between the MyWellness Key and the ActiGraph accelerometer during controlled graded treadmill walking (r=0.91, p<0.01) and in free-living settings (r=0.73-0.76 for light to vigorous PA, respectively, p<0.01). No associations were observed between the MyWellness Key and the BAR and GPAQ (p>0.05). Conclusions The MyWellness Key has a high concurrent validity with the ActiGraph accelerometer to detect PA in both controlled laboratory and free-living settings.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 113
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PHYS ACT GUID AM
[2]   Development of the World Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) [J].
Armstrong T. ;
Bull F. .
Journal of Public Health, 2006, 14 (2) :66-70
[3]   Validation of the New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire (NZPAQ-LF) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF) with accelerometry [J].
Boon, R. M. ;
Hamlin, M. J. ;
Steel, G. D. ;
Ross, J. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 44 (10) :741-746
[4]   A METHOD TO ASSESS ENERGY-EXPENDITURE IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS [J].
BOUCHARD, C ;
TREMBLAY, A ;
LEBLANC, C ;
LORTIE, G ;
SAVARD, R ;
THERIAULT, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1983, 37 (03) :461-467
[5]   Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost [J].
Crouter, SE ;
Schneider, PL ;
Karabulut, M ;
Bassett, DR .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2003, 35 (08) :1455-1460
[6]   Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer [J].
Freedson, PS ;
Melanson, E ;
Sirard, J .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1998, 30 (05) :777-781
[7]   Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity [J].
Ham, Sandra A. ;
Reis, Jared P. ;
Strath, Scott J. ;
Dubose, Katrina D. ;
Ainsworth, Barbara E. .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2007, 39 (01) :52-58
[8]  
Haskell WL, 2007, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V39, P1423, DOI [10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185649]
[9]   Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field [J].
Hendelman, D ;
Miller, K ;
Bagget, C ;
Debold, E ;
Freedson, P .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2000, 32 (09) :S442-S449
[10]   Evaluation of the SenseWear Pro Armband™ to assess energy expenditure during exercise [J].
Jakicic, JM ;
Marcus, M ;
Gallagher, KI ;
Randall, C ;
Thomas, E ;
Goss, FL ;
Robertson, RJ .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (05) :897-904