Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for the prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications

被引:38
作者
Imberger, Georgina [1 ]
McIlroy, David [2 ]
Pace, Nathan Leon [3 ]
Wetterslev, Jorn [4 ]
Brok, Jesper [5 ]
Moller, Ann Merete [6 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Grp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Anesthesiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Ctr Clin Intervent Res, Copenhagen Trial Unit,Dept 3344, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Paediat, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[6] Herlev Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2010年 / 09期
关键词
RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; INTRAOPERATIVE VENTILATORY STRATEGIES; ALVEOLAR RECRUITMENT STRATEGY; FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY; TRIAL SEQUENTIAL-ANALYSIS; LOWER TIDAL VOLUMES; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; GAS-EXCHANGE; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; ARTERIAL OXYGENATION;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007922.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background General anaesthesia causes atelectasis which can lead to impaired respiratory function. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a mechanical manoeuvre which increases functional residual capacity (FRC) and prevents collapse of the airways thereby reducing atelectasis. It is not known whether intra-operative PEEP alters the risk of postoperative mortality and pulmonary complications. Objectives To assess the benefits and harms of intraoperative PEEP, for all adult surgical patients, on postoperative mortality and pulmonary outcomes. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 4), MEDLINE (via Ovid) (1966 to January 2010), EMBASE (via Ovid) (1980 to January 2010), CINAHL (via EBSCOhost) (1982 to January 2010), ISI Web of Science (1945 to January 2010) and LILACS (via BIREME interface) (1982 to January 2010). Selection criteria We included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effect of PEEP versus no PEEP, during general anaesthesia, on postoperative mortality and postoperative respiratory complications. We included studies irrespective of language and publication status. Data collection and analysis Two investigators independently selected papers, extracted data that fulfilled our outcome criteria and assessed the quality of all included trials. We undertook pooled analyses, where appropriate. For our primary outcome (mortality) and two secondary outcomes (respiratory failure and pneumonia), we calculated the number of further patients needed (information size) in order to make reliable conclusions. Main results We included eight randomized trials with a total of 330 patients. Two trials had a low risk of bias. There was no difference demonstrated for mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.14 to 6.39). Two statistically significant results were found: the PEEP group had a higher PaO2/FiO(2) on day 1 postoperatively (mean difference (MD) 22.98, 95% CI 4.40 to 41.55) and postoperative atelectasis (defined as an area of collapsed lung, quantified by computerized tomography (CT) scan) was less in the PEEP group (SMD -1.2, 95% CI -1.78 to -0.79). There were no adverse events reported in the three trials that adequately measured these outcomes (barotrauma and cardiac complications). Using information size calculations, we estimated that a further 21,200 patients would need to be randomized in order to make a reliable conclusion about PEEP and mortality. Authors' conclusions There is currently insufficient evidence to make conclusions about whether intraoperative PEEP alters the risk of postoperative mortality and respiratory complications among undifferentiated surgical patients.
引用
收藏
页数:44
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Effects of four intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric banding in obese patients [J].
Almarakbi, W. A. ;
Fawzi, H. M. ;
Alhashemi, J. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 102 (06) :862-868
[2]  
AZAB V, 2005, EGYPTIAN J ANAESTHES, V21, P219
[3]   PULMONARY DENSITIES DURING ANESTHESIA WITH MUSCULAR RELAXATION - A PROPOSAL OF ATELECTASIS [J].
BRISMAR, B ;
HEDENSTIERNA, G ;
LUNDQUIST, H ;
STRANDBERG, A ;
SVENSSON, L ;
TOKICS, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (04) :422-428
[4]   Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses [J].
Brok, Jesper ;
Thorlund, Kristian ;
Gluud, Christian ;
Wetterslev, Jorn .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (08) :763-769
[5]  
Brower RG, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V351, P327
[6]   Effects of descending positive end-expiratory pressure on lung mechanics and aeration in healthy anaesthetized piglets [J].
Carvalho, Alysson Roncally S. ;
Jandre, Frederico C. ;
Pino, Alexandre V. ;
Bozza, Fernando A. ;
Salluh, Jorge I. ;
Rodrigues, Rosana S. ;
Soares, Joao H. N. ;
Giannella-Neto, Antonio .
CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 10 (04)
[7]   Mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressure prevents alveolar coagulation in patients without lung injury [J].
Choi, Goda ;
Wolthuis, Esther K. ;
Bresser, Paul ;
Levi, Marcel ;
van der Poll, Tom ;
Dzoljic, Misa ;
Vroom, Margreeth B. ;
Schultz, Marcus J. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (04) :689-695
[8]   The effect of intraoperative ventilation strategies on perioperative atelectasis [J].
Clarke, JP ;
Schuitemaker, MN ;
Sleigh, JW .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1998, 26 (03) :262-266
[9]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, V4
[10]   THE EFFECT OF POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE ON RESPIRATORY RESISTIVE PROPERTIES IN ANESTHETIZED PARALYZED HUMANS [J].
COHENDY, R ;
RIPART, J ;
ELEDJAM, JJ .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1994, 7 (02) :286-291