Computer-Aided Diagnosis Improves the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric-MRI: A Multi-Observer Performance Study Involving Inexperienced Readers

被引:14
作者
Giannini, Valentina [1 ,2 ]
Mazzetti, Simone [1 ,2 ]
Cappello, Giovanni [2 ]
Doronzio, Valeria Maria [2 ]
Vassallo, Lorenzo [2 ]
Russo, Filippo [2 ]
Giacobbe, Alessandro [3 ]
Muto, Giovanni [4 ]
Regge, Daniele [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Surg Sci, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[2] IRCCS, Candiolo Canc Inst, FPO, Dept Radiol, I-10060 Candiolo, Italy
[3] Humanitas Gradenigo, Dept Urol, I-10153 Turin, Italy
[4] Humanitas Univ, Dept Urol, I-10153 Turin, Italy
关键词
computer aided diagnosis; prostate cancer; artificial intelligence; assisted reading; CT COLONOGRAPHY; 2ND READER; LESIONS;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics11060973
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Recently, Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems have been proposed to help radiologists in detecting and characterizing Prostate Cancer (PCa). However, few studies evaluated the performances of these systems in a clinical setting, especially when used by non-experienced readers. The main aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of non-experienced readers when reporting assisted by the likelihood map generated by a CAD system, and to compare the results with the unassisted interpretation. Three resident radiologists were asked to review multiparametric-MRI of patients with and without PCa, both unassisted and assisted by a CAD system. In both reading sessions, residents recorded all positive cases, and sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were computed and compared. The dataset comprised 90 patients (45 with at least one clinically significant biopsy-confirmed PCa). Sensitivity significantly increased in the CAD assisted mode for patients with at least one clinically significant lesion (GS > 6) (68.7% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.018). Overall specificity was not statistically different between unassisted and assisted sessions (94.8% vs. 89.6, p = 0.072). The use of the CAD system significantly increases the per-patient sensitivity of inexperienced readers in the detection of clinically significant PCa, without negatively affecting specificity, while significantly reducing overall reporting time.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]   Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Validation Cohort Study with Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping as the Reference Standard [J].
Arumainayagam, Nimalan ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Allen, Clare ;
Sohaib, S. Aslam ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Emberton, Mark .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (03) :761-769
[3]   Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Shtern, Faina ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Margolis, Daniel ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Cornud, Francois ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :41-49
[4]   Impact of Data Presentation on Physician Performance Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Decision Support Systems [J].
Barinov, L. ;
Jairaj, A. ;
Becker, M. ;
Seymour, S. ;
Lee, E. ;
Schram, A. ;
Lane, E. ;
Goldszal, A. ;
Quigley, D. ;
Paster, L. .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2019, 32 (03) :408-416
[5]   Update of the Standard Operating Procedure on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer [J].
Bjurlin, Marc A. ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Eggener, Scott ;
Fulgham, Pat F. ;
Margolis, Daniel J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. ;
Rubenstein, Jonathan N. ;
Rukstalis, Daniel B. ;
Taneja, Samir S. ;
Turkbey, Baris .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (04) :706-712
[6]   Assessment of the Incremental Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) for Interpretation of CT Colonography by Experienced and Inexperienced Readers [J].
Boone, Darren ;
Mallett, Susan ;
McQuillan, Justine ;
Taylor, Stuart A. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Halligan, Steve .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09)
[7]   Integration of Chest CT CAD into the Clinical Workflow and Impact on Radiologist Efficiency [J].
Brown, Matthew ;
Browning, Patrick ;
Wahi-Anwar, M. Wasil ;
Murphy, Mitchell ;
Delgado, Jayson ;
Greenspan, Hayit ;
Abtin, Fereidoun ;
Ghahremani, Shahnaz ;
Yaghmai, Nazanin ;
da Costa, Irene ;
Becker, Moshe ;
Goldin, Jonathan .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) :626-631
[8]  
Dhand N.K., Statulator: An Online Statistical Calculator. Sample Size Calculator for Comparing Two Independent Means
[9]   Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
De Visschere, Pieter ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Giannarini, Gianluca ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
Taneja, Samir S. ;
Thoeny, Harriet ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Villers, Arnauld .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (06) :1045-1053
[10]   Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with computer-aided detection: experienced observer performance study [J].
Giannini, Valentina ;
Mazzetti, Simone ;
Armando, Enrico ;
Carabalona, Silvia ;
Russo, Filippo ;
Giacobbe, Alessandro ;
Muto, Giovanni ;
Regge, Daniele .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (10) :4200-4208